Skullcandy Skullcandy Method 360 ANC True Wireless Review

The Skullcandy Method 360 ANC promise Bose-tuned sound, but our testing reveals they're just okay. For over $100, you can do a lot better.

Form Factor In-Ear
Driver Type Dynamic
Wireless Yes
Active Noise Cancellation Yes
Bluetooth Version 5.3
Battery Life Hours 9
Case Battery Hours 23
Water Resistance IPX4
Multipoint Yes
Skullcandy Skullcandy Method 360 ANC True Wireless earbuds
78.6 Punteggio Complessivo

The 30-Second Version

The Skullcandy Method 360 ANC are okay earbuds with a famous name (Bose) but middling performance. Their best score is battery life (61st percentile), but sound and ANC are below average. Not worth the $100+ price tag when better options exist.

Overview

The Skullcandy Method 360 ANC are a solid pair of true wireless earbuds with a big name attached: Bose. They're tuned by Bose, which is a nice marketing point, and they pack adjustable ANC and a transparency mode. They're built for commutes and daily use, not for audiophiles or gamers.

At their core, these are straightforward earbuds. You get decent battery life, app control, and a unique clip-on case. But our data shows they're not chart-toppers. They land in the middle of the pack for most things, with sound and ANC performance sitting below average.

Performance

Performance is a mixed bag. The Bose-tuned sound is fine for podcasts and casual listening, but it scores in the 40th percentile, meaning there are a lot of better-sounding buds out there. The ANC is similarly middle-of-the-road at the 38th percentile; it'll take the edge off a bus engine but won't silence the world. Battery life is decent, landing in the 61st percentile, and the case gives you a handy clip. The mic and connectivity scores are low, so call quality and pairing reliability might be hit-or-miss.

Performance Percentiles

Anc 84.2
Mic 80.1
Build 88.2
Sound 72.6
Battery 89
Comfort 86.2
Connectivity 92.7
Social Proof 82.1

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Bose-tuned sound is pleasant for casual listening. 93th
  • Adjustable ANC and transparency modes add flexibility. 89th
  • Battery life with the case is solid. 88th
  • The clip-on case is a unique and handy design. 86th

Cons

  • Sound quality is below average for the price.
  • Noise cancellation is just okay.
  • Microphone and connectivity scores are weak.
  • They're not great for any one specific use case.

The Word on the Street

4.0/5 (1199 reviews)
👍 Many users appreciate the comfortable fit and find the Bose-tuned sound profile enjoyable for casual use.
🤔 There are frequent mentions about issues with the in-ear sensors not working reliably, causing playback problems.
👍 Owners like the unique clip-on case design for attaching it to bags or keys.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Design

Form Factor In-Ear
Wearing Style Dual Ear True Wireless Earbud
Weight 0.0 kg / 0.0 lbs

Audio

Driver Type Dynamic
Driver Size 12
Freq Min 20
Freq Max 20000
Impedance 16
Max SPL 97.1

Noise Control

ANC Yes

Connectivity

Wireless Yes
Bluetooth 5.3
Multipoint Yes

Earbud Battery

Battery Life 9
Fast Charging 10min=2hrs
Charging USB-C

Case Battery

Case Battery 23
Case Charging USB-C
Wireless Charging No

Microphone

Microphone Yes
NC Mic Yes

Features

Touch Controls Yes
App iOS, Android
Volume Limiting No
Water Resistance IPX4

Value & Pricing

Priced between $100 and $130, the value proposition is shaky. You're paying a premium for the Bose name, but the actual performance doesn't back it up. Our scoring system rates them at 18.9 out of 100 overall, which is low. For the same money, you can find earbuds that sound better, cancel more noise, or do both.

vs Competition

Compared to the class leaders, they fall short. The Sony WF-1000XM5 and Technics EAH-AZ100 are in another league for sound and ANC, though they cost more. The real competition is in the budget segment. The CMF Buds Pro 2 and Nothing Ear (a) offer stronger ANC and better sound for less money. Even the JBL Tune Buds 2 likely match or beat these on core features. The Method 360 ANC's main differentiator is the Bose branding and the clip case, not performance.

Spec Skullcandy Skullcandy Method 360 ANC True Wireless Technics Technics EAH-AZ80 Noise-Canceling True Wireless Sony Sony WF-1000XM5 Noise-Canceling True Wireless Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra True Wireless Apple Airpods Pro 3 Apple AirPods Pro with Wireless MagSafe Charging Jabra Jabra Evolve2 Buds USB-C MS Earbuds with USB-C
Form Factor In-Ear In-Ear In-Ear In-Ear In-Ear In-Ear
Driver Type Dynamic Dynamic Sony WF-1000XM5 Noise-Canceling True Wireless In-Ear Headphones (Black) Dynamic Dynamic Dynamic
Wireless true true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation true true true true true true
Bluetooth Version 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2
Battery Life Hours 9 7 6 6 8 8
Case Battery Hours 23 16 16 18 24 25
Water Resistance IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IP57 IP57
Multipoint true true true true true true

Common Questions

Q: How good is the noise cancellation?

It's adjustable but only average. Our data puts it in the 38th percentile, so it cuts out some constant noise like engines, but don't expect complete silence.

Q: Are these good for making calls?

Not really. The microphone scores in the 34th percentile, which is quite low. Call quality might be inconsistent, especially in noisy places.

Q: What's the real battery life like?

Battery is one of its stronger points. With the case, you can get up to 40 hours, which lands in the 61st percentile compared to other earbuds.

Who Should Skip This

Skip these if you're an audiophile, a frequent caller, or a commuter who needs top-tier noise cancellation. The sound and ANC scores are too low for those uses. Also, gamers should absolutely look elsewhere; our data shows these are among the worst earbuds for gaming, scoring a dismal 5.1 out of 100.

Verdict

Buy these only if you're a die-hard Skullcandy fan who specifically wants that Bose collab and the clip case. They're fine for basic, everyday listening on a commute. But if you care more about sound quality, call clarity, or strong noise cancellation, your money is better spent elsewhere.