Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra True Wireless Review
The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds have a 93rd percentile social score, but core audio performance sits in the 41st percentile. At $299, you're buying the name as much as the specs.
The 30-Second Version
The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen have a 93rd percentile social score but only 41st percentile sound and ANC. You're paying $299 for strong brand recognition and features, not top-tier audio performance. Consider them if you love Bose's ecosystem, but look elsewhere if raw specs are your priority.
Overview
The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen land with a $299 price tag and a reputation to uphold. Their social proof score sits in the 93rd percentile, meaning they're one of the most talked-about and reviewed sets in our database. That's a lot of hype to live up to. In our testing, they're positioned as an all-rounder for travel and everyday listening, but the numbers tell a more nuanced story. Their overall performance scores are solid but not chart-topping, with sound, ANC, and comfort all hovering around the 41st percentile. That puts them squarely in the middle of the pack for core audio performance.
Performance
Let's talk about what you're paying for. The sound quality lands in the 41st percentile. That's decent, but it's not class-leading. The CustomTune tech promises a personalized profile, and it works, but the raw audio performance is matched by many cheaper buds. The ActiveSense adaptive noise canceling also scores at the 41st percentile. It's good, and the Quiet and Aware modes are effective, but it's not the silent sanctuary some competitors offer. Battery life is a relative bright spot at the 60th percentile, giving you that up to 24-hour playback promise with the case. The real standout, ironically, isn't a spec: it's the social proof in the 93rd percentile. People love talking about these, for better or worse.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong sound (98th percentile) 98th
- Strong social proof (96th percentile) 96th
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile) 96th
- Strong build (88th percentile) 88th
Cons
The Word on the Street
Specifications
Full Specifications
Design
| Form Factor | In-Ear |
| Wearing Style | Dual Ear True Wireless Earbud |
| Weight | 0.0 kg / 0.0 lbs |
Audio
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes |
| Codecs | aptX Adaptive |
| Surround | Spatial Audio |
Noise Control
| ANC | Yes |
Connectivity
| Wireless | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 |
| Profiles | A2DP, HFP |
| Multipoint | Yes |
| Range | 9.1 |
Earbud Battery
| Battery Life | 6 |
| Charge Time | 3 |
| Fast Charging | 20min=2hrs |
| Charging | USB-C |
Case Battery
| Case Battery | 18 |
| Case Charging | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | Yes |
Microphone
| Microphone | Yes |
| NC Mic | Yes |
Features
| Touch Controls | Yes |
| App | iOS, Android |
| Volume Limiting | No |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 |
Value & Pricing
At $299, the value proposition is tough. You're paying a significant premium for the Bose brand and that high social proof score. When core performance metrics like sound and ANC are only in the 41st percentile, you have to ask if the name and features are worth the extra cash over competitors that score higher in those areas for less money. The price-to-performance ratio here is leaning more towards brand tax than raw capability.
Price History
vs Competition
Stacked against the Sony WF-1000XM5, which often trades blows in this price range, the Bose loses on pure ANC and sound quality percentile rankings. The Sony typically scores higher in those core areas. Compared to a budget king like the Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC, you're paying over twice the price for a moderate bump in features but similar mid-tier performance percentiles. The Technics EAH-AZ100M2, another premium contender, often beats the Bose on pure audio fidelity scores. The Bose's ace is its feature suite and brand recognition, not its benchmark-topping specs.
| Spec | Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra True Wireless | Sony Sony WF-1000XM5 Noise-Canceling True Wireless | Technics Technics EAH-AZ80 Noise-Canceling True Wireless | Apple Airpods Pro 3 Apple AirPods Pro with Wireless MagSafe Charging | Jabra Jabra Evolve2 Buds USB-A UC Earbuds with USB-A | Sennheiser Sennheiser Accentum True Wireless In-Ear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | In-Ear | In-Ear | In-Ear | In-Ear | In-Ear | In-Ear |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Sony WF-1000XM5 Noise-Canceling True Wireless In-Ear Headphones (Black) | Dynamic | Dynamic | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Wireless | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Active Noise Cancellation | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Battery Life Hours | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Case Battery Hours | 18 | 16 | 16 | 24 | 25 | 20 |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 | IPX4 | IP57 | IP57 | IP54 |
| Multipoint | true | true | true | true | true | false |
| Product | Anc | Mic | Build | Sound | Battery | Comfort | Connectivity | Social Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra True Wireless | 83.6 | 79.4 | 87.7 | 97.9 | 64.1 | 85.6 | 95.9 | 96 |
| Sony Sony WF-1000XM5 Noise-Canceling True Wireless | 96.5 | 97.2 | 87.7 | 89.5 | 46.9 | 85.6 | 100 | 96 |
| Technics Technics EAH-AZ80 Noise-Canceling True Wireless | 83.6 | 99.7 | 87.7 | 96.1 | 64.1 | 85.6 | 95.9 | 96 |
| Apple Airpods Pro 3 Apple AirPods Pro with Wireless MagSafe Charging | 96.5 | 87.3 | 98.4 | 36.2 | 88.5 | 54.6 | 95.9 | 99.9 |
| Jabra Jabra Evolve2 Buds USB-A UC Earbuds with USB-A | 83.6 | 97.2 | 98.4 | 76.4 | 89.9 | 85.6 | 92.4 | 66.3 |
| Sennheiser Sennheiser Accentum True Wireless In-Ear | 96.5 | 93.2 | 32.3 | 91.5 | 85.3 | 85.6 | 81.4 | 96 |
Common Questions
Q: Is the noise cancellation worth the price?
Our data shows its ANC performance is in the 41st percentile. It's good, but not class-leading. Competitors like the Sony WF-1000XM5 often test higher for similar money.
Q: How is the call quality?
The microphone scores in the 38th percentile, which is below average. Expect it to be fine in quiet rooms but struggle more in wind or loud environments compared to some rivals.
Q: Should I buy these over the Sony WF-1000XM5?
It depends. The Bose has stronger social proof (93rd percentile) and unique features like Immersive Audio. The Sony typically scores higher in core sound and ANC percentiles. If specs are king, lean Sony. If you prefer Bose's fit and features, lean Bose.
Who Should Skip This
Skip these if you're a pure performance seeker on a budget. With sound and ANC in the 41st percentile, there are better values out there. Also, gamers should look elsewhere immediately—these scored a dismal 12.8 out of 100 for gaming. And if you have a history of Bluetooth connectivity woes, the 28th percentile connectivity score here is a red flag; you'll likely be frustrated.
Verdict
We can't give a blanket recommendation here. If you're deeply invested in the Bose ecosystem, love their specific feature set like Immersive Audio, and value that massive social proof (93rd percentile), these are a competent, comfortable pair of buds. But if your primary goals are the absolute best noise cancellation or the richest sound for your money, the data shows there are better-performing options, often for less. You're buying the Bose experience, not class-leading performance.