Miro S67 Black/Blue 64GB
Miro
34 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Motorola Moto G XT2413V Sapphire Blue 64GB
Motorola
37 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Battery Life
Budget
Foldable
Business
Rugged
Gaming
Compact
Flagship
Photography
Specifiche
| Miro S67 | Motorola Moto G XT2413V | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 6.8 | 6.5 |
| Display Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | — | 720 x 1600 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| HDR | — | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Octa-Core | — |
| Processor Model | UniSoc T765 | Snapdragon 680 |
| CPU Cores | 8★ | — |
| CPU Speed | 2.30 | 2.40★ |
| RAM | 8 GB★ | 4 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 13 MP | 50 MP★ |
| Camera Count | 1 | 1 |
| Front Camera | 5 MP★ | — |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 4,900 mAh | 5,000 mAh★ |
| Wired Charging | 10W★ | — |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0★ | — |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | — |
| Design & Build | ||
| Form Factor | bar | bar |
| Weight | — | 0.30 kg★ |
| Fingerprint | side-mounted | — |
| Face Recognition | ✓★ | — |
| OS | Android | Android |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Stereo Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pro e Contro
Miro S67 Black/Blue 64GB
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average social proof (24th percentile)
- Below average camera (28th percentile)
- Below average performance (30th percentile)
Motorola Moto G XT2413V Sapphire Blue 64GB
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong battery (74th percentile)
- Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average connectivity (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average performance (31th percentile)
- Below average camera (31th percentile)
Prezzi
Miro S67 Black/Blue 64GB0.287punteggio per dollaro
vs
Motorola Moto G XT2413V Sapphire Blue 64GB0.920punteggio per dollaro
Motorola Moto G XT2413V Sapphire Blue 64GB offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 3.2x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Motorola Moto G XT2413V
Scores 37 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 30 specs.
