Panasonic LUMIX H-RSA100400 100-400mm
The 200-800mm equivalent telephoto reach, Leica-certified optics with 3 ED elements, weather sealing, and Power O.I.S. stabilization capture sharp distant subjects in tough conditions. Weighing just 96g, its portable design pairs with 0.5x magnification (1.0x via DMW-TC20 teleconverter) and a 1.3m minimum focus for close-up flexibility uncommon in super-telephoto lenses. This lens suits travel and wildlife photographers needing a lightweight, rugged ultratelephoto zoom for handheld field shooting.
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Panasonic Leica 100-400mm is the sharpest, best-built telephoto you can slap on a Micro Four Thirds camera, scoring in the 89th percentile for optics. The f/6.3 aperture is a bright-light dealbreaker for some, and the hood is annoyingly fiddly, but if reach and image quality are your priorities, this is the lens to get. At around $1,700 from the right store, it's a serious tool for wildlife photographers who don't want to lug a full-frame rig.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Feels like a tank with a Leica badge — absolutely gorgeous build and an included tripod mount. 98th
- Razor-sharp images across the frame, even at 400mm (800mm equivalent). 89th
- Image stabilization is strong enough to handhold at absurd 800mm reach. 88th
- Weather-sealed and balances well on larger MFT bodies like the GH or G9. 81th
Cons
- f/6.3 at 400mm forces high ISOs or tripods in anything but bright sunlight.
- The lens hood design is finicky; many owners report it's frustrating to attach and remove.
- Zoom ring can feel stiff right out of the box and takes some use to loosen up.
- Priced near $2K, it's a tough sell if you're cross-shopping full-frame telephotos.
What owners think
The Word on the Street
How owner sentiment changed over time
ExclusiveBased on when customers actually wrote their reviews — so you can see whether early praise held up.
The proof
Performance
Our database puts this lens's optical quality in the 89th percentile, and that checks out in the field — it's tack sharp even wide open at 400mm, with barely any falloff at the edges. Build quality is truly best-in-class (97th percentile), rivaling lenses costing twice as much. Stabilization is well above average, keeping things shake-free when you're handholding at ridiculous focal lengths. Autofocus is quick and accurate for stills, though it's firmly middle-of-the-pack; not a speed demon but perfectly fine for tracking birds. Bokeh is average, which is fine for a lens like this. The weak spot is macro — at 26th percentile, it's one of the worst we've seen for close-up work, so ignore the marketing claims if that matters to you.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 |
| Focal Length Max | 400 |
| Elements | 20 |
| Groups | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 |
| ED Elements | 3 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | 6.3 |
| Min Aperture | 4 |
| Constant | No |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Yes |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 1300 |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x |
vs Competition
This lens sits in a weird spot in the lineup because most of its listed competitors aren't direct rivals. The Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 and Viltrox 15mm f/1.7 are fast full-frame glass for totally different tasks, and the Nikon Z 18-140mm is a slower superzoom with half the reach. Against its real MFT competition, like the Olympus 100-400mm or the older Panasonic 100-300mm, the Leica absolutely wins on build and image quality. But if you need an f/2.8 aperture or plan to adapt to a full-frame body later, skip this and look at a Sigma or Tamron 150-600mm — you'll lose some portability, but gain light and flexibility.
| Spec | Panasonic LUMIX H-RSA100400 100-400mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD | Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR | Viltrox 13mm F1.4 f/1.4 E STM Auto Focus Ultra Wide Angle | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 100-400mm | 16-300mm | 18-300mm | 28-400mm | 13mm | 18-135mm |
| Max Aperture | 6.3 | f/3.5 | f/3.5 | f/4 | f/1.4 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E | Fuji X | Nikon Z | Sony E | Canon EF-S |
| Stabilization | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | false | true | false | false |
| Weight (g) | 96 | 615 | 92 | 726 | 415 | 515 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | HLA | VXD linear motor | STM | STM | STM |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | Wide-Angle | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panasonic LUMIX H-RSA100400 100-400mm | 54.5 | 65 | 98.2 | 25 | 88.5 | 62.5 | 44.3 | 88.3 | 20.9 | 81.3 |
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare | 54.5 | 84.3 | 59 | 85.9 | 98.9 | 76.9 | 0 | 99.6 | 78 | 99.1 |
| Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare | 98.3 | 74.9 | 96.6 | 87.7 | 74.6 | 76.9 | 30.2 | 99.2 | 83.1 | 81.3 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Compare | 86.9 | 77.8 | 51.6 | 81.3 | 97 | 71.2 | 0 | 98.9 | 83.1 | 98.3 |
| Viltrox 13mm F1.4 f/1.4 E STM Auto Focus Ultra Wide Angle Compare | 86.9 | 96.6 | 42.1 | 89.4 | 82.6 | 96.4 | 80.8 | 34.2 | 74 | 81.3 |
| Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Compare | 86.9 | 74.9 | 47.3 | 33.2 | 80.1 | 76.9 | 0 | 96 | 78 | 92.6 |
Price
Value & Pricing
Prices range from about $1,715 to $2,150 depending on where you shop, with Newegg offering the most affordable option. That's a big spread, so shop around. For the money, you're getting top-tier build and optics in an MFT mount, and if you're a dedicated wildlife photographer, it's absolutely worth it. But the value argument gets shaky if you compare it to full-frame alternatives that can be cheaper and faster. The Panasonic 100-300mm saves you a pile of cash and weight, though you'll sacrifice that premium Leica feel and some sharpness. If you need the absolute best MFT telephoto, this is it — just accept you're paying a premium for the privilege.
Newegg 1 offers From $1,715
Amazon_keepa 1 offers From CA$2,048
Price History
Read more
Overview
Panasonic's Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 II is basically a super-telephoto cannon for Micro Four Thirds, giving you an 800mm equivalent reach in a package that doesn't require a sherpa. The Leica badge isn't just for show either — the build quality is exceptional, with weather sealing, a tripod mount, and that reassuring heft that whispers premium. It's aimed squarely at wildlife shooters who want to pull distant subjects close without swapping to a full-frame monster.
That said, the f/6.3 aperture at the long end is a compromise, and at nearly a kilogram it's not exactly a pocket lens. But for MFT users who need serious glass for birding or travel, this one punches way above its weight class optically. Just know you'll be trading light-gathering for portability compared to bigger sensor systems.
Common Questions
Q: Can this lens be used for macro photography?
Despite the advertised 0.5x magnification, our tests rate macro performance as one of the worst we've seen. You'll get much better close-up results with a dedicated macro lens.
Q: Is the lens too heavy for a small Micro Four Thirds body?
At about 985 grams, it's heavy for tiny bodies like the GX series, but balances nicely on a GH or G9 with a grip. Most owners find the weight manageable given the reach.
Q: How effective is the optical stabilization at 400mm?
It's above average, earning a strong score in our database. You can handhold at 800mm equivalent in good light and get sharp shots, but low-light situations will still push you to a tripod.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this lens if you frequently shoot in dim forests or at dawn — the f/6.3 aperture will force you to crank ISO or lug a tripod, and there are cheaper, faster full-frame options that do better in low light. If you're on a strict budget and just want to try wildlife photography, grab the Panasonic 100-300mm instead; it's far lighter on your wallet and your neck, even though you'll lose the premium build and ultimate sharpness.
Verdict
Birders, wildlife junkies, and anyone with a Micro Four Thirds kit who needs an 800mm equivalent with zero excuses on sharpness should buy this lens. It's the best super-telephoto available for the system, period. Just plan your shoots for daylight or carry a good tripod because that slow aperture means dusk and dawn hunters will feel the pain. If you can stomach the price and hood quirks, it's a long-term investment that will deliver stunning results.