Price drop 2%

Panasonic LUMIX H-RSA100400 100-400mm

★★★★☆ 4.4 (4)

The 200-800mm equivalent telephoto reach, Leica-certified optics with 3 ED elements, weather sealing, and Power O.I.S. stabilization capture sharp distant subjects in tough conditions. Weighing just 96g, its portable design pairs with 0.5x magnification (1.0x via DMW-TC20 teleconverter) and a 1.3m minimum focus for close-up flexibility uncommon in super-telephoto lenses. This lens suits travel and wildlife photographers needing a lightweight, rugged ultratelephoto zoom for handheld field shooting.

Focal length 100-400mm
Aperture 6.3
Mount Micro Four Thirds
stabilization Yes
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 96 g
af type Autofocus
lens type zoom
Panasonic LUMIX H-RSA100400 100-400mm lens
64 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The Panasonic Leica 100-400mm is the sharpest, best-built telephoto you can slap on a Micro Four Thirds camera, scoring in the 89th percentile for optics. The f/6.3 aperture is a bright-light dealbreaker for some, and the hood is annoyingly fiddly, but if reach and image quality are your priorities, this is the lens to get. At around $1,700 from the right store, it's a serious tool for wildlife photographers who don't want to lug a full-frame rig.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Feels like a tank with a Leica badge — absolutely gorgeous build and an included tripod mount. 98th
  • Razor-sharp images across the frame, even at 400mm (800mm equivalent). 89th
  • Image stabilization is strong enough to handhold at absurd 800mm reach. 88th
  • Weather-sealed and balances well on larger MFT bodies like the GH or G9. 81th

Cons

  • f/6.3 at 400mm forces high ISOs or tripods in anything but bright sunlight.
  • The lens hood design is finicky; many owners report it's frustrating to attach and remove.
  • Zoom ring can feel stiff right out of the box and takes some use to loosen up.
  • Priced near $2K, it's a tough sell if you're cross-shopping full-frame telephotos.

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.4/5 (4 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently rave about the build quality and sharpness, calling it a true Leica-level lens that delivers gorgeous photos.
👍 Autofocus is fast and reliable for wildlife, with many shooters getting sharp bird-in-flight shots without missing a beat.
👎 The lens hood is a common headache — multiple users say it's tough to mount securely and even harder to remove after a shoot.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews — so you can see whether early praise held up.

82/100Our AI sentiment readlow confidence · 6 sources · May 2026

The proof

Performance

Our database puts this lens's optical quality in the 89th percentile, and that checks out in the field — it's tack sharp even wide open at 400mm, with barely any falloff at the edges. Build quality is truly best-in-class (97th percentile), rivaling lenses costing twice as much. Stabilization is well above average, keeping things shake-free when you're handholding at ridiculous focal lengths. Autofocus is quick and accurate for stills, though it's firmly middle-of-the-pack; not a speed demon but perfectly fine for tracking birds. Bokeh is average, which is fine for a lens like this. The weak spot is macro — at 26th percentile, it's one of the worst we've seen for close-up work, so ignore the marketing claims if that matters to you.

Performance Percentiles

AF 54.5
Bokeh 65
Build 98.2
Macro 25
Optical 88.5
Aperture 62.5
User Sentiment 44.3
Versatility 88.3
Social Proof 20.9
Stabilization 81.3

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type zoom
Focal Length Min 100
Focal Length Max 400
Elements 20
Groups 13
Aspherical Elements 1
ED Elements 3

Aperture

Max Aperture 6.3
Min Aperture 4
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Micro Four Thirds
Format micro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization Yes

Focus

Min Focus Distance 1300
Max Magnification 0.5x

vs Competition

This lens sits in a weird spot in the lineup because most of its listed competitors aren't direct rivals. The Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 and Viltrox 15mm f/1.7 are fast full-frame glass for totally different tasks, and the Nikon Z 18-140mm is a slower superzoom with half the reach. Against its real MFT competition, like the Olympus 100-400mm or the older Panasonic 100-300mm, the Leica absolutely wins on build and image quality. But if you need an f/2.8 aperture or plan to adapt to a full-frame body later, skip this and look at a Sigma or Tamron 150-600mm — you'll lose some portability, but gain light and flexibility.

Spec Panasonic LUMIX H-RSA100400 100-400mm Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Viltrox 13mm F1.4 f/1.4 E STM Auto Focus Ultra Wide Angle Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Focal Length 100-400mm 16-300mm 18-300mm 28-400mm 13mm 18-135mm
Max Aperture 6.3 f/3.5 f/3.5 f/4 f/1.4 f/3.5
Mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E Fuji X Nikon Z Sony E Canon EF-S
Stabilization true true true true true true
Weather Sealed true true false true false false
Weight (g) 96 615 92 726 415 515
AF Type Autofocus HLA VXD linear motor STM STM STM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom Wide-Angle zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Panasonic LUMIX H-RSA100400 100-400mm 54.56598.22588.562.544.388.320.981.3
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare 54.584.35985.998.976.9099.67899.1
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare 98.374.996.687.774.676.930.299.283.181.3
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR Compare 86.977.851.681.39771.2098.983.198.3
Viltrox 13mm F1.4 f/1.4 E STM Auto Focus Ultra Wide Angle Compare 86.996.642.189.482.696.480.834.27481.3
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Compare 86.974.947.333.280.176.90967892.6

Price

Value & Pricing

Prices range from about $1,715 to $2,150 depending on where you shop, with Newegg offering the most affordable option. That's a big spread, so shop around. For the money, you're getting top-tier build and optics in an MFT mount, and if you're a dedicated wildlife photographer, it's absolutely worth it. But the value argument gets shaky if you compare it to full-frame alternatives that can be cheaper and faster. The Panasonic 100-300mm saves you a pile of cash and weight, though you'll sacrifice that premium Leica feel and some sharpness. If you need the absolute best MFT telephoto, this is it — just accept you're paying a premium for the privilege.

From $1,715 2 offers across 2 retailers
Newegg 1 offers From $1,715
Amazon_keepa 1 offers From CA$2,048

Price History

$1,400 $1,600 $1,800 $2,000 $2,200 $2,400 May 8May 16Jun 19 $2,048

Read more

Overview

Panasonic's Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 II is basically a super-telephoto cannon for Micro Four Thirds, giving you an 800mm equivalent reach in a package that doesn't require a sherpa. The Leica badge isn't just for show either — the build quality is exceptional, with weather sealing, a tripod mount, and that reassuring heft that whispers premium. It's aimed squarely at wildlife shooters who want to pull distant subjects close without swapping to a full-frame monster.

That said, the f/6.3 aperture at the long end is a compromise, and at nearly a kilogram it's not exactly a pocket lens. But for MFT users who need serious glass for birding or travel, this one punches way above its weight class optically. Just know you'll be trading light-gathering for portability compared to bigger sensor systems.

Common Questions

Q: Can this lens be used for macro photography?

Despite the advertised 0.5x magnification, our tests rate macro performance as one of the worst we've seen. You'll get much better close-up results with a dedicated macro lens.

Q: Is the lens too heavy for a small Micro Four Thirds body?

At about 985 grams, it's heavy for tiny bodies like the GX series, but balances nicely on a GH or G9 with a grip. Most owners find the weight manageable given the reach.

Q: How effective is the optical stabilization at 400mm?

It's above average, earning a strong score in our database. You can handhold at 800mm equivalent in good light and get sharp shots, but low-light situations will still push you to a tripod.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this lens if you frequently shoot in dim forests or at dawn — the f/6.3 aperture will force you to crank ISO or lug a tripod, and there are cheaper, faster full-frame options that do better in low light. If you're on a strict budget and just want to try wildlife photography, grab the Panasonic 100-300mm instead; it's far lighter on your wallet and your neck, even though you'll lose the premium build and ultimate sharpness.

Verdict

Birders, wildlife junkies, and anyone with a Micro Four Thirds kit who needs an 800mm equivalent with zero excuses on sharpness should buy this lens. It's the best super-telephoto available for the system, period. Just plan your shoots for daylight or carry a good tripod because that slow aperture means dusk and dawn hunters will feel the pain. If you can stomach the price and hood quirks, it's a long-term investment that will deliver stunning results.

Usage Scores

Macro (54.8)Overall (64.2)Budget (60.3)Street (77.2)Travel (83.5)Portrait (66.3)Landscape (74.1)Professional (78)Video Cinema (75.2)Wildlife Sports (75.2)

Similar Products