FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink

Kodak
24 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Video
FLATIC
39
Kodak
18
Product Photography
FLATIC
37
Kodak
25
Beginner
FLATIC
36
Kodak
27
Photography
FLATIC
36
Kodak
19
Wedding Events
FLATIC
33
Kodak
17
Youtube
FLATIC
31
Kodak
18
Streaming
FLATIC
26
Kodak
28
Sports Wildlife
FLATIC
26
Kodak
16
Travel
FLATIC
23
Kodak
20
Vlogging
FLATIC
23
Kodak
15

Spezifikationen

FLATICKodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/3-inch
Megapixels64 MP
Video
Max Resolution5K
Log Profile
Build
Weight0.78 kg0.45 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Vor- & Nachteile

FLATIC

  • Strong video (75th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (74th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average display (24th percentile)
  • Below average burst (27th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (30th percentile)

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink

  • Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (21th percentile)
  • Below average display (24th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (25th percentile)

Preise

FLATIC is 46 $ cheaper (1.9x less).

FLATIC0.587Score pro Dollar
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink0.242Score pro Dollar

FLATIC bietet 2.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink

Fazit

Gewinner: FLATIC

Scores 32 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 2 of 8 specs.

FLATIC Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen