Minolta MN40WP Red
Minolta
38 Gesamtbewertung
vs
FLATIC
FLATIC
32 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Product Photography
Travel
Youtube
Video
Vlogging
Streaming
Wedding Events
Photography
Beginner
Sports Wildlife
Spezifikationen
| Minolta MN40WP | FLATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | 1/3-inch |
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 64 MP★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 1★ | — |
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 10 fps★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | 5K |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps★ | — |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| Articulating | ✓★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.16 kg★ | 0.78 kg |
| Battery Life | 100 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | — |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
| USB | USB-C★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Minolta MN40WP Red
- Strong stabilization (68th percentile)
- Strong build (67th percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Strong sensor (65th percentile)
- Below average battery (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average af (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average evf (34th percentile)
FLATIC
- Strong video (75th percentile)
- Strong sensor (74th percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
Preise
Minolta MN40WP Red0.438Score pro Dollar
vs
FLATIC0.587Score pro Dollar
FLATIC bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Minolta MN40WP
Scores 38 overall, wins 7 of 10 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.
