Xiaomi XIAOMI Poco Pad M1 Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) Review

The Poco Pad M1 offers a stunning 12.1-inch 120Hz display for just $340, but our testing reveals major compromises in gaming power and productivity. It's a one-trick pony, but that trick is impressive.

CPU Apple M1
Screen 12.1" 2560x1600
OS Xiaomi HyperOS 2
Stylus No
Cellular No
Xiaomi XIAOMI Poco Pad M1 Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) tablet
28.5 Overall Score

The 30-Second Version

The Poco Pad M1 is a budget giant with a fantastic 12.1-inch 120Hz screen for the price, but major compromises elsewhere. Its Snapdragon CPU is snappy for daily tasks, but graphics performance is bottom-of-the-barrel, killing gaming. At $340, it's a great pick as a dedicated media consumption tablet, but a poor choice for anything requiring power or polish. Consider it only if a big, smooth display is your absolute top priority.

Overview

The Poco Pad M1 is a bit of a puzzle. It's a big, beautiful 12.1-inch tablet with a sharp 120Hz screen, a massive battery, and a price tag that makes you do a double-take. At around $340, it's pitching itself as a budget entertainment powerhouse, and on paper, it looks like it could pull it off. But our data shows it's a specialist, not an all-rounder.

This tablet is for the person who wants a giant screen for watching movies, reading comics, or browsing the web from the couch, and doesn't want to spend iPad money. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 processor and that high-refresh-rate display are the main attractions here. It's not trying to be a laptop replacement or a serious gaming device. It's trying to be your go-to media consumption slab.

The interesting part is where it lands in our rankings. Its CPU and screen score in the 78th and 76th percentiles, which is genuinely good for the price. But then you see the GPU is in the 2nd percentile, and productivity scores are rock bottom. That tells you everything: this is a device built for one job, and it's betting you'll forgive its shortcomings for that giant, smooth screen.

Performance

Let's talk about what those numbers mean. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 is a solid mid-range chip. In our benchmarks, its CPU performance lands in the 78th percentile, which means it's faster than most tablets in its class for everyday tasks. Apps open quickly, scrolling is fluid thanks to the 120Hz panel, and you can have a dozen browser tabs open without a hiccup. For streaming, reading, and light social media, it feels snappy and responsive.

But the GPU score tells the other side of the story. Sitting in the 2nd percentile means it's near the bottom of the pack for graphics. Don't expect to play Genshin Impact at high settings, or do any serious video editing. This is why its entertainment score (33/100) is decent but not stellar—it's great for watching content, but stumbles when you ask it to create or play demanding games. The 120Hz screen is smooth, but the silicon behind it can't always keep up with intense graphical loads.

Performance Percentiles

CPU 79
GPU 1.8
RAM 35.5
Screen 77.1
Battery 48.8
Feature 19.4
Storage 30.6
Connectivity 74.7
Social Proof 6.1

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • That 12.1-inch, 2.5K 120Hz display is a steal at this price. It's bright, sharp, and smooth, putting it in the 76th percentile for screens. 79th
  • The 12,000mAh battery is huge. While its overall battery score is average (49th percentile), the raw capacity means you'll get many, many hours of video playback. 77th
  • The Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 CPU provides surprisingly good general performance, landing in the 78th percentile. Day-to-day navigation feels fast. 75th
  • Expandable storage via microSD card up to 2TB is a major win, fixing the low internal storage percentile (30th).
  • Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos support provide a solid, immersive audio experience for movies and music.

Cons

  • Graphics performance is abysmal, in the 2nd percentile. This is not a tablet for gaming beyond simple titles. 2th
  • Productivity is its weakest area (23.4/100). The software experience (Xiaomi HyperOS) and lack of premium accessories hold it back as a work device. 6th
  • Only 8GB of RAM, which scores in the 35th percentile. This may limit heavy multitasking in the future. 19th
  • Cameras are basic 8MP sensors. Fine for video calls, but don't plan on taking great photos. 31th
  • Very low social proof score (7th percentile). It's a new, niche product with few reviews, so buying it feels like a bit of a leap of faith.

The Word on the Street

3.5/5 (3 reviews)
👍 Early buyers are consistently impressed with the large, high-quality display, noting that the 120Hz refresh rate and 2.5K resolution feel premium for the price.
👍 The massive 12,000mAh battery receives praise, with users reporting it easily lasts multiple days with moderate use for video streaming and browsing.
🤔 There's a common note about the software feeling unfamiliar or cluttered compared to more mainstream options, though some users appreciate the customization options HyperOS provides.
👎 A recurring concern is the lack of reviews and community feedback, making the purchase feel like a gamble on an unknown entity in the tablet space.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

CPU Apple M1
Cores 8
GPU X1

Display

Size 12.1"
Resolution 2560 (QHD)

Connectivity

Wi-Fi WiFi 6

Physical

Weight 0.5 kg / 1.1 lbs
OS Xiaomi HyperOS 2

Value & Pricing

At $340, the Poco Pad M1 is playing in a weird space. It's significantly cheaper than an iPad Air or Galaxy Tab S9, but it's also offering a much larger screen than most budget tablets. You're paying for that big, smooth display above all else. The price-to-performance ratio is excellent if your performance metric is 'screen size and smoothness for media.'

Where it gets tricky is that you can find older generation iPads or Samsung tablets around this price during sales, and they often come with a stronger overall ecosystem, better software support, and more proven performance. The Poco Pad is betting you'll value the raw screen specs over that brand trust.

$340

vs Competition

The obvious competitor is the base model iPad (10th gen). For a similar price, you get Apple's stellar software support, a better app ecosystem, and performance that's more balanced across CPU and GPU. But you're also stuck with a smaller 10.9-inch screen and a 60Hz refresh rate. If a big, smooth screen is your top priority, the Poco Pad wins. If you care about overall polish, app quality, and longevity, the iPad is the safer bet.

Then there's the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE. It's more expensive, but it offers an S-Pen, a more refined software experience, and DeX mode for productivity. Its performance is more well-rounded. The Poco Pad undercuts it on price and screen refresh rate, but the Galaxy Tab is a much more capable all-purpose device. For a pure media consumption tablet on a tight budget, the Poco Pad has an argument. For anyone who might also want to take notes or do light work, the Samsung is worth the extra money.

Spec Xiaomi XIAOMI Poco Pad M1 Only WiFi (No Calls or Text) Apple iPad Pro Apple - 11-inch iPad Pro M5 chip Wi-Fi 256GB with Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Samsung - Galaxy Tab S10+ - 12.4" 256GB - Wi-Fi - Microsoft Surface Pro Microsoft - Surface Pro - Copilot+ PC - 13” OLED Lenovo Lenovo - Idea Tab Pro - 12.7" 3K Tablet - 8GB RAM GPD GPD Pocket 4: Mini Laptop with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX
CPU Apple M1 Apple M5 Mediatek MT6989 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 MediaTek Dimensity AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
RAM (GB) 12 12 32 8 32
Storage (GB) 256 256 1000 256 2048
Screen 12.1" 2560x1600 11" 2420x1668 12.4" 2800x1752 13" 2880x1920 12.7" 2944x1840 8.8" 2560x1600
OS Xiaomi HyperOS 2 iPadOS Android 14 Windows 11 Home Android 14 Windows 11 Home
Stylus false true true false true false
Cellular false false false false false false

Common Questions

Q: Can the Poco Pad M1 handle gaming?

Not really, at least not demanding games. Our data puts its GPU performance in the 2nd percentile, which is among the lowest we've tested. It's fine for casual games like puzzles or older titles, but don't expect to play Fortnite or Genshin Impact at enjoyable settings. This is a media tablet first.

Q: How does the screen compare to an iPad?

It's bigger and has a higher refresh rate than any base model iPad. The 12.1-inch 120Hz panel is its best feature. In terms of raw specs—resolution, refresh rate, size—it beats the standard iPad. However, iPad displays often have better color calibration, brightness consistency, and overall polish out of the box.

Q: Is 8GB of RAM enough?

For its intended use as a media consumption device, 8GB is sufficient. It scores in the 35th percentile, which is middling. You can stream video, browse the web, and jump between social media apps without issue. However, if you plan on heavy multitasking with many demanding apps, it could become a limitation over time.

Q: What's the catch with the low price?

The catch is in the balance. You're getting a top-tier screen and a good CPU for the money, but sacrificing GPU power, brand recognition, software update certainty, and overall polish. You're also buying into a device with very little user feedback. It's a trade-off: premium screen specs for a budget price, but compromises everywhere else.

Who Should Skip This

Students or professionals looking for a tablet to take notes, write papers, or do light creative work should look elsewhere. The Poco Pad M1's productivity score of 23.4/100 is a major red flag. HyperOS isn't optimized for work like iPadOS or Samsung DeX, and the accessory ecosystem (like good keyboard cases) is virtually non-existent. You'd be much better served by an older iPad with a keyboard folio or a Galaxy Tab S FE model.

Mobile gamers should also steer clear. That 2nd percentile GPU score isn't a typo; it means this is one of the slowest tablets we've seen for graphics. If gaming is even a secondary use case, this tablet will disappoint. Instead, consider a device with a stronger GPU, even if it means a slightly smaller screen or a higher price.

Verdict

Buy the Poco Pad M1 if you want a giant, smooth-screened Netflix machine and you're on a strict budget. It's for the person who watches movies in bed, reads digital magazines, and browses the web, and who values screen real estate over everything else. For that specific use case, it delivers impressive value.

Skip it if you have any aspirations of using this for work, serious gaming, or as a primary device. Its weak GPU, mediocre productivity scores, and unproven software support make it a poor choice for those roles. Also, if you're wary of buying a device with almost no review history, look at more established options. This is a niche pick for a very specific type of user.