Canon Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens Review
The Canon 10-18mm lens offers pro-level stabilization at a beginner's price, making it a top pick for Canon crop-sensor shooters—as long as you don't need a fast aperture.
Overview
If you're shooting on a Canon APS-C DSLR like a Rebel or an 80D and you're looking for a super wide-angle lens that won't break the bank, the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM is probably the first one you'll find. It's incredibly light at just 240 grams, and it gives you a 35mm equivalent range of 16-28.8mm, which is perfect for landscapes, tight interiors, or creative shots where you want to exaggerate perspective. People often ask if this is a good lens for beginners, and the answer is a definite yes. It's affordable, easy to use, and the image stabilization is a huge help when you're shooting handheld in lower light. Just know it's designed for crop-sensor cameras only, so it won't work on a full-frame Canon body.
Performance
The optical performance is solid for the price, landing in the 84th percentile. The lens uses one UD and one aspherical element to help control distortion and chromatic aberration, which are common challenges with ultra-wides. In practice, you get sharp centers and decent edges, especially when stopped down to around f/8. The built-in image stabilization is a standout feature, scoring in the 89th percentile. It's rated for about 4 stops of shake correction, which is fantastic for a lens this cheap and lets you shoot at surprisingly slow shutter speeds without a tripod. The autofocus is where it shows its budget nature, sitting in the 47th percentile. The STM motor is quiet and fine for photos, but it's not the fastest or most confident for video. The variable aperture, which shifts from f/4.5 at 10mm to f/5.6 at 18mm, is the main performance trade-off.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Extremely lightweight and compact. 90th
- Excellent Image Stabilization for handheld shots. 89th
- Sharp optical performance for the price. 84th
- Very affordable entry point to ultra-wide photography. 71th
- Quiet STM autofocus motor.
Cons
- Variable, slow aperture (f/4.5-5.6) limits low-light use. 20th
- Autofocus speed is just average. 21th
- Not weather-sealed.
- Plastic build feels a bit cheap (though it's durable).
- Bokeh quality is poor, so it's not a portrait lens.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Focal Length Min | 18 |
| Focal Length Max | 18 |
| Elements | 14 |
| Groups | 11 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/4.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | Canon EF-S |
| Format | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.5 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 67 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Yes |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 220 |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.67 |
Value & Pricing
At around $349 new, this lens is all about value. You're getting Canon's reliable optics and their very effective IS system in a package that costs a fraction of their pro-level ultra-wides. The main alternative in the Canon ecosystem is the pricier EF-S 10-22mm, which has a wider constant aperture but often costs twice as much. For most hobbyists and beginners, the 10-18mm's combination of price and performance is hard to beat, even with the slower variable aperture.
vs Competition
Let's compare it to some popular alternatives. The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 is the direct upgrade. It's sharper, has a slightly wider aperture, and better build quality, but it's heavier, lacks IS, and costs significantly more. If you need IS and can't afford the 10-22mm, this 10-18mm is the clear choice. Looking at third-party options, a lens like the Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 offers a constant, brighter aperture, which is great for low light, but it's bigger, heavier, and also lacks stabilization. For a Canon APS-C shooter who values a light kit and needs stabilization for handheld video or photos, the 10-18mm's unique combo is tough to match at this price.
Verdict
So, should you buy it? If you're a Canon APS-C DSLR user who wants an affordable, lightweight ultra-wide lens primarily for daylight, travel, or interior photography, this is an easy recommendation. The image stabilization is a game-changer for video and low-light stills. However, if you shoot a lot in dim light without a tripod and need a faster aperture, or if you're planning to upgrade to a full-frame camera soon, you might want to look at a constant-aperture alternative or save for a more expensive lens. For everyone else, this little lens punches way above its weight class.