Panasonic Panasonic LUMIX Professional 12-35mm Camera Lens G Review
The Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8 has the fastest autofocus we've tested, making it a video powerhouse. But its optical sharpness is just above average, creating a clear trade-off.
Overview
The Panasonic Lumix 12-35mm f/2.8 is a lens that leads with its speed. Its autofocus performance sits in the 100th percentile, which is a fancy way of saying it's as fast as they come. That, combined with its 89th percentile image stabilization, makes it a serious tool for video and fast-paced shooting. You're getting a constant f/2.8 aperture across a 12-35mm zoom range, which gives you a 24-70mm equivalent field of view on Micro Four Thirds cameras. It's a classic workhorse range, covering wide-angle to short telephoto in one package. The build is solid and weather-sealed, though at 454 grams, it's not the lightest option out there. It scores highest for budget-conscious buyers and videographers, but its optical sharpness percentile is a more modest 34th, which tells you where the trade-offs are.
Performance
Let's talk about what this lens does best. That 100th percentile autofocus isn't just a number. It means the linear motor is lightning fast and dead silent, which is pure gold for video. You won't hear focus breathing or hunting in your clips. Pair that with the 89th percentile stabilization (Panasonic's POWER O.I.S.), and you have a combo that lets you shoot handheld video smoothly. The constant f/2.8 aperture is a real benefit, keeping your exposure consistent as you zoom. But the numbers also show its limits. The optical performance percentile is 34th. In practice, that means it's sharp and contrasty enough for most work, especially video, but it might not have the ultimate corner-to-corner crispness of a prime lens or a more expensive zoom when you're pixel-peeping stills.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong af (100th percentile) 100th
- Strong stabilization (89th percentile) 89th
- Strong versatility (86th percentile) 86th
- Strong macro (66th percentile) 66th
Cons
- Below average optical (34th percentile) 34th
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Wide-Angle |
| Focal Length Min | 12 |
| Focal Length Max | 35 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
Build
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds |
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.0 lbs |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Linear Motor |
| Stabilization | Yes |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 250 |
Value & Pricing
At $655, this lens asks a serious question. You're paying for that exceptional autofocus and stabilization system, plus the weather-sealing and constant f/2.8 zoom. If you're a Panasonic shooter who needs a reliable, fast, all-in-one lens for video and general use, that price can be justified. But that 34th percentile optical score is the elephant in the room. For photographers who prioritize ultimate sharpness in stills, there might be better value in a pair of sharp prime lenses for a similar total cost. It's a tool built for a specific job—consistent, reliable performance in motion—rather than being the absolute best at any one thing.
vs Competition
Compared to primes like the Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 or Meike 55mm f/1.8, the Lumix zoom gives up a lot of light (f/2.8 vs. f/1.7-ish) and potentially better optical sharpness for its versatility and stabilization. Those primes will have better bokeh and low-light performance but lack zoom and OIS. Against other standard zooms in the system, this Lumix's killer advantage is that 100th percentile AF. A lens like the Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 might match or beat it on build and optics, but it won't have the same seamless, silent focus for video. So your choice is clear: pick this for its hybrid video/stills speed and convenience, or look to primes or competing zooms if pure stills image quality is your top priority.
Verdict
This is a lens with a very clear strength. If you shoot video on a Panasonic Lumix body, or you need a general-purpose lens with absolutely reliable, fast autofocus, this 12-35mm f/2.8 is an easy recommendation. The performance data backs that up completely. But if you're primarily a stills photographer chasing the best possible image quality for your dollar, that 34th percentile optical score is a real caveat. You might be happier with a prime lens or even a different brand's standard zoom. For the right user—the hybrid shooter or the videographer—it's a fantastic, do-almost-anything tool. For the pixel-peeping stills artist, it's merely very good.