Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R5 Mark II Mirrorless Camera | 45MP Full Review
The Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers stunning 45MP images and pro video, but its lack of stabilization and a fixed screen hold it back. It's a specialist's tool, not for everyone.
Overview
The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is a powerhouse for photographers who need serious resolution. Its 45MP sensor is in the 98th percentile, so the detail you get is absolutely insane. It's built for pros who shoot commercial work, portraits, or landscapes where every pixel counts. But this isn't just a stills camera. Canon threw in some serious video chops too, with 8K60 RAW and 4K120 recording, aiming to fix the overheating issues that plagued the original R5.
Performance
That sensor is the star. Image quality is top-tier, and the autofocus is brilliant, landing in the 89th percentile with AI that tracks people, animals, and even planes. The video specs look great on paper, but its overall video score is only in the 62nd percentile. That's because it's missing in-body stabilization, and the fixed rear display makes it a pain for vloggers or solo shooters. It's a hybrid camera that leans heavily towards stills.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- The 45MP sensor delivers stunning, ultra-detailed images. 98th
- AI-powered autofocus is incredibly smart and reliable. 89th
- High-end 8K60 RAW and 4K120 video recording is possible.
- Improved cooling should prevent overheating during long shoots.
Cons
- No in-body stabilization, which is a big miss at this price.
- The fixed rear screen is terrible for creative angles or vlogging.
- Battery life and build quality are just average for the class.
- It's a large, heavy system that's not meant to be discreet.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Sensor
| Type | BSI CMOS |
| Size | Full Frame |
| Megapixels | 45 |
Autofocus
| Subject Detection | Yes |
Video
| RAW Video | Yes |
Value & Pricing
At $3,899, this is a serious investment. You're paying for that exceptional sensor and the pro-level video codecs. If you're a working photographer who also needs high-end video, it could be worth it. But if you don't need 45MP or 8K RAW, you're spending a lot on specs you won't use. It's a specialist's tool, not a generalist's bargain.
vs Competition
Compared to the Sony a7R IV, you're trading Sony's higher 61MP resolution for Canon's better video features and newer autofocus. The a7R IV is a pure stills beast. Against the Fujifilm X-S20, it's no contest for video flexibility—the Fuji has IBIS and a flip screen for a fraction of the price, but its sensor is much smaller. The Canon R7 is a better value for sports and wildlife with its faster burst shooting, though its sensor is lower resolution. The R5 Mark II sits in a niche of its own: ultra-high-res stills with pro video.
Verdict
Buy this if you're a professional photographer who demands the ultimate in resolution and also needs top-tier video capabilities in one body. It's perfect for studio, portrait, or landscape shooters who occasionally shoot cinematic clips. Don't buy it if you're a vlogger, need stabilization, or want a lightweight travel camera. It's a brilliant, expensive hammer for a very specific nail.