Yashica DigiMate DigiMate Black Review
The Yashica DigiMate promises 64MP photos and 120fps burst shooting for pocket change. But our tests reveal a camera with exactly one great trick and a long list of compromises.
The 30-Second Version
The Yashica DigiMate offers a stunning 120fps burst mode and 4K video at a dirt-cheap price, but nearly everything else is disappointing. Build quality is the worst we've tested, there's no stabilization, and autofocus struggles. Only worth considering if you find it under $100 and need a disposable rapid-fire camera. For anything else, get a used smartphone or a name-brand compact instead.
Overview
The Yashica DigiMate is what happens when a brand with a legacy name slaps impressive-sounding specs onto a camera that costs less than a dinner for two. It promises 64 megapixels, 4K video, and a 120fps burst mode, all in a 110-gram body that comes in fun colors. On paper, that reads like a steal. In hand, it's a different story. This is a camera for people who need something, anything, to take photos with, and don't want to spend smartphone money. Think kids, absolute beginners, or someone who needs a beater camera for a single trip and doesn't care if it breaks.
We've tracked this DigiMate across our database, and the numbers paint a clear picture: one remarkable stat surrounded by a sea of compromises. The burst shooting is genuinely top-tier, placing in the absolute best bracket among all compact cameras we've tested. But nearly every other metric lands somewhere between mediocre and the worst we've seen. That's a tough balance to strike, and it means the DigiMate is a specialty tool at best. If your day consists of shooting 120 frames per second in good light and nothing else, congratulations, you've found your soulmate camera. For everyone else, the cracks show quickly.
Yashica of old made some legendary film cameras. This DigiMate isn't that. It's a rebadged budget camera sharing DNA with a dozen other no-name models you'll find online, and its build quality sits at the very bottom of our rankings, dead last. But if you know what you're getting into and keep expectations firmly in the toy camera range, there's a weird, niche appeal to something this light and cheap. Just don't mistake it for a tool that'll grow with you.
Performance
That 120fps mechanical burst is the star of the show, pure and simple. It's in the 98th percentile among all point-and-shoots we've tested, meaning it shoots faster than almost everything else out there. In practice, you can capture a fleeting expression or a quick movement with a stack of frames to pick from, and that's genuinely cool at any price. But the rest of the camera can't keep up. Autofocus is sluggish, landing in the bottom third of our database, so while you're blasting 120 frames, many of them won't be in focus. In bright daylight, it's manageable, but dim indoor scenes or moving subjects will frustrate you.
Video specs tell a similar overpromise story. It records 4K at 30fps, and the resolution is fine for casual clips, but there's no stabilization at all. Handheld footage looks jittery, and the 2.7-inch fixed screen is small and hard to see in sunlight. Our testing puts video performance right in the middle of the pack, which sounds okay until you realize most smartphones in your pocket do better with electronic stabilization and bigger screens. The 64MP sensor itself is an interesting choice. It's a tiny 1/2.3-inch chip, like what you'd find in a budget phone, so those 64 megapixels are mostly a marketing number. You're not going to get DSLR-level detail here, but in good light, it produces passable snapshots that print fine at small sizes. The percentile for sensor quality lands in the solidly average range, which is actually surprising given the tiny chip, but it's not going to wow anyone who's used a modern phone.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Insane 120fps burst shooting, faster than nearly any competitor 98th
- Incredibly lightweight at just 110g 75th
- Can be found for under $100 if you hunt
- 4K video recording at a bare-bones price
- Available in multiple colors, so you can pick one that doesn't scream "budget"
Cons
- Build quality is dead last in our database, feels cheap and fragile 1th
- No stabilization at all, video and photos suffer from shake 26th
- Autofocus is sluggish and unreliable in anything but perfect light 32th
- Tiny 2.7-inch fixed screen is hard to see outdoors 34th
- Battery life is below average, and charging takes a while
Specifications
Full Specifications
Sensor
| Type | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch" |
| Megapixels | 64 |
| ISO Range | 100 |
Shooting
| Burst (Mechanical) | 120 |
| Electronic Shutter | Yes |
Video
| Max Resolution | 4K |
| 4K FPS | 30 |
| 1080p FPS | 60 |
| Codec | MP4 |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 2.7 |
| Touchscreen | No |
| Articulating | No |
Build
| Weight | 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | No |
| Bluetooth | No |
| USB | USB Type C |
| Hot Shoe | No |
Value & Pricing
Here's where things get weird. The DigiMate's price seems to vary by over $20,000 across different vendors, which is obviously some kind of data glitch rather than reality. What you'll actually find is that these cameras pop up for as little as $70, and that's the only price range where it makes any sense at all. At seventy bucks, you're getting a functional camera with a killer burst mode and 4K video as a bonus. That's a fair trade for something this lightweight.
If you pay more than about $100, you're getting ripped off. Even at that price, a used older compact from a mainstream brand or a modern budget phone will run circles around it in autofocus, screen quality, and video stabilization. The DigiMate's value proposition lives and dies entirely on that sub-$100 street price. Anything above that, and it's competing with gear that actually works reliably.
vs Competition
Stack it against actual cameras like the Fujifilm X-T30 II or the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV (oddly listed as competitors, probably due to keyword scrapers) and the gap is gigantic and obvious. Those are interchangeable-lens mirrorless cameras with big sensors, great autofocus, and build quality that can take a knock. They cost several times more, sure, but they're tools for photography enthusiasts. The DigiMate isn't in the same conversation. It's a fixed-lens toy by comparison.
A more realistic comparison is the Gavonde W05 or LIYTIFOR LR1, which are essentially the same camera in different plastic shells. They all share identical specs and horrendous build quality. Among that crowd, the Yashica name offers slightly better brand recognition, but you're still picking your poison of cheap materials and unreliable autofocus. If you want a real budget compact that doesn't fall apart, look at a used Canon PowerShot or Sony Cyber-shot from a few years back. You'll trade away the flashy 64MP spec for a 20MP sensor that actually performs, and get image stabilization that works.
| Spec | Yashica DigiMate DigiMate | Fujifilm X-M5 X-M5 | LIYTIFOR LR1 | Gavonde W05 | FJFJOPK | OM System Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | compact | mirrorless | mirrorless | compact | compact | Mirrorless |
| Sensor | 64MP 1/2.3-inch | 26.1MP aps-c | 80MP 1/2.3-inch | 64MP | 64MP | 16MP Micro Four Thirds |
| AF Points | - | 425 | - | - | - | 81 |
| Burst FPS | 120 | 20 | 30 | 5 | - | 8.5 |
| Video | 4K @30fps | 6K @60fps | 4K | 8K @60fps | 5K | 4K |
| IBIS | false | false | false | false | false | false |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | false | false | false | true |
| Weight (g) | 110 | 355 | 290 | 848 | 434 | 499 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Evf | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yashica DigiMate DigiMate | 33.9 | 36 | 1 | 98.2 | 59.1 | 75 | 44.9 | 25.9 | 43.7 | 32.3 |
| Fujifilm X-M5 X-M5 Compare | 88.1 | 36 | 15.1 | 88.7 | 93.8 | 92.7 | 92.3 | 84.3 | 93 | 32.3 |
| LIYTIFOR LR1 Compare | 33.9 | 36 | 11.2 | 85.4 | 76.6 | 81.4 | 44.9 | 25.9 | 66.7 | 32.3 |
| Gavonde W05 Compare | 33.9 | 36 | 54 | 29 | 91.3 | 75 | 44.9 | 56.4 | 78.6 | 32.3 |
| FJFJOPK Compare | 33.9 | 36 | 19 | 29 | 76.6 | 75 | 44.9 | 84.3 | 59.2 | 32.3 |
| OM System Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II Compare | 72.1 | 36 | 76.6 | 60.5 | 59.1 | 61.6 | 44.9 | 56.4 | 18.5 | 32.3 |
Common Questions
Q: Does the 64MP sensor really produce sharper photos?
In theory, a higher megapixel count gives you more room to crop, but the tiny 1/2.3-inch sensor here is a limiting factor. Our sensor quality ranking puts it right around average for its class. In good daylight, you'll get decent snapshots, but don't expect the level of detail you'd see from a larger sensor or a good smartphone. The high number is mostly marketing; the lens and sensor size matter more.
Q: Can I use this camera for vlogging?
It's not a good choice for vlogging. There's no image stabilization, so handheld video is shaky, and the 2.7-inch screen is fixed, so you can't see yourself while recording. Autofocus is also unreliable in indoor lighting. Our scores rate vlogging as the DigiMate's weakest area, so if that's your goal, look for a camera with a flip screen and decent stabilization.
Q: How is the battery life?
Battery performance is below average in our database. You'll get a few hours of casual shooting, but if you're recording a lot of 4K video or using the burst mode heavily, expect to recharge frequently. It's a good idea to carry a spare battery if you plan to use it all day, and charging can be slow.
Q: Is the 120fps burst mode actually useful?
It's the standout feature. At that speed, you can capture fast action in a series of frames and pick the best one later. However, the autofocus can't always keep up, so many shots may be out of focus. It works best in bright conditions with subjects that aren't moving erratically toward or away from you.
Who Should Skip This
Anyone who takes photography even slightly seriously should avoid this camera. The lack of stabilization and poor autofocus will fight you every step of the way. If you're looking for a reliable family camera, a used Sony RX100 series or an older Canon PowerShot G model will be far more capable and durable. Vloggers and content creators should especially skip it, the unstabilized 4K is hard to watch, and the screen doesn't flip. Even budget smartphone cameras from the last few years will give you better autofocus and video quality without the shaky footage. The DigiMate is essentially a toy with one impressive spec, and if that one spec doesn't solve a specific problem for you, there's no reason to buy it. Save your cash for something that doesn't rank dead last in build quality.
Verdict
For the absolute, scraping-the-bottom-of-the-barrel budget, the Yashica DigiMate has exactly one use case: you need an ultra-light, ultra-cheap camera to shoot rapid-fire bursts of relatively static subjects in good light. Think documenting a science project, snapping product photos for eBay, or letting a clumsy kid take nature pics without worrying about damage. At $70, it's disposable enough to take those risks.
Everyone else should skip it. If you want to learn photography, this camera will actively hinder you because its autofocus and lack of stabilization make it frustrating to use. Vloggers will hate the shaky, unstabilized footage and the tiny screen that doesn't flip. Anyone wanting a travel camera deserves something that won't break if you look at it wrong. Put the same money toward a used smartphone or an older compact from a trusted brand, and you'll get a much better experience. The DigiMate is a novelty with one neat trick, not a camera you'll want to rely on.