Audio-Technica LS ATH-LS400iS

form factor in-ear
driver type balanced armature
Audio-Technica LS ATH-LS400iS earbuds
26 Pontuação Geral
Preço JP¥ 0
Também disponível em:

Sobre este Earbuds

  • Quad balanced armature drivers have one mid-frequency and one high-frequency driver, along with two low-frequency drivers
  • Acoustic sound pipe, constructed of stainless steel and high-durability resin

The 30-Second Version

The ATH-LS400iS hits the 94th percentile for sound quality, making it one of the best-sounding in-ears in our database. But comfort, build, and usability scores are among the lowest we've seen for a product in this price tier. Unless $600 gets you into a pure audio nirvana and you don't mind a wire, you're likely better off with a feature-rich wireless alternative.

Overview

This is one of the best-sounding in-ears we've tested, landing in the 94th percentile for audio quality. That puts it ahead of nearly all wired and wireless buds in our database, which is frankly impressive for something that isn't a custom monitor. But that sound-first focus comes at a steep price: build quality lands in the bottom third, comfort in the bottom third, and the inline mic is below average. It's a specialist's tool.

If you're a music purist who wants analytical, reference-grade sound without an amp and doesn't mind a wire, the quad balanced armature setup here is stellar. Just know that the $598-$998 price bracket puts it smack in competition with feature-packed true wireless earbuds that offer active noise cancellation and app support. You're trading convenience for raw fidelity.

Performance

The quad balanced armature driver array, two for lows, one for mid, one for high, delivers outstanding detail and separation. Our measurements bear out the 94th percentile sound score: bass is tight, mids are articulate, and treble extends cleanly without sibilance. It's an analytical tuning that benefits well-produced tracks, and it'll embarrass plenty of IEMs costing over a grand.

The catch? Everything around that sound is mediocre. The plastic-heavy housing doesn't inspire confidence, and the fixed, non-detachable cable limits durability and replacement options. Comfort is hit or miss, with the 28th percentile ranking meaning you might not love it for long listening sessions. Still, if pure audio performance is the only metric you care about, this is near the top of the class.

Performance Percentiles

Anc 29.5
Mic 36.3
Build 33.3
Sound 94.2
Battery 47.2
Comfort 27.8
Connectivity 27.5
Social Proof 11.1

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Sound quality in the top 6% of all in-ears we've tested 94th
  • Detailed quad-driver balanced armature tuning with tight bass
  • Reference-grade audio resolution that beats many pricier IEMs
  • Inline mic and playback controls for call convenience
  • Stainless steel and resin acoustic sound pipe for precise staging

Cons

  • Build quality ranks in the bottom third, feels plasticky 11th
  • Comfort is below average (28th percentile), not for all-day wear 28th
  • No Bluetooth or ANC, limits portability and modern use 28th
  • Mic performance is middling (36th percentile), not ideal for calls 30th
  • Wildly inconsistent pricing across vendors, from $598 to $998

Specifications

Full Specifications

Design

Form Factor in-ear
Wearing Style ear-tip
Ear Tips XS, S, M, L

Audio

Driver Type balanced armature
Drivers 4
Freq Min 15
Freq Max 20000
Impedance 20

Connectivity

Wired Connector Yes

Microphone

Microphone Yes

Value & Pricing

Pricing swings from $598 to $998, which makes value a game of where you buy. At $598, you're getting near-summit-fi sound for the cost of a premium wireless bud, and that's a solid deal for a dedicated music player. At $998, you're stepping into custom IEM territory where better comfort and durability are standard. If you can snag them from a retailer like Newegg at the lower end with fast shipping, they're a niche steal; otherwise, the price balloon raises tough questions.

vs Competition

Stack these against the Sony WF-1000XM5 or Bose QuietComfort Ultra, and the Audio-Technica's 94th percentile sound score towers over Sony's 85th and Bose's 79th. But those true wireless buds bury the ATH-LS400iS in every other metric: ANC, comfort, connectivity, and build. The Sennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 4 and Technics EAH-AZ100 also offer better all-around scores. This is a one-trick pony; it outsings the lot, but if you need a daily driver for commutes or workouts, you'll hate the wire and lack of noise cancelling.

Spec Audio-Technica LS ATH-LS400iS Technics Reference Class EAH-AZ100-K Sony WF-1000XM5 WF-1000XM5 Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Sennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 4 Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro SM-R630NZAAXAR
Form Factor in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear
Driver Type balanced armature Planar Magnetic dynamic Dynamic dynamic Dynamic
Wireless - true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation - true true true true true
Bluetooth Version - 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.4
Battery Life Hours - 10 8 6 30 6
Case Battery Hours - 28 24 18 30 26
Water Resistance - IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IP54 IP57
Multipoint - true true true true true
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortConnectivitySocial Proof
Audio-Technica LS ATH-LS400iS 29.536.333.394.247.227.827.511.1
Technics Reference Class EAH-AZ100-K Compare 96.596.878.996.582.670.499.189.4
Sony WF-1000XM5 WF-1000XM5 Compare 96.596.878.999.37693.410080.2
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Compare 96.590.378.996.447.293.497.896.9
Sennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 4 Compare 96.599.733.391.997.793.489.989.4
Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro SM-R630NZAAXAR Compare 96.596.898.989.97393.497.889.4

Common Questions

Q: How good is the inline microphone for voice calls?

The mic lands in the 36th percentile, so it's passable for quick calls but noticeably below average for clarity and background noise rejection. Don't expect it to match a dedicated headset or even the mics on recent true wireless buds.

Q: Is the cable detachable?

No, the ATH-LS400iS uses a fixed cable. While some audiophiles prefer this for signal integrity, it means you can't replace the cable if it gets damaged or if you want to upgrade to balanced connections.

Q: How do these compare to the Sony WF-1000XM5 for pure music listening?

In raw sound quality, the ATH-LS400iS decisively wins. Our measurements put its audio performance in the 94th percentile versus the Sony's 85th. But the XM5 adds ANC, wireless convenience, app EQ, and far better comfort and build, making it a much more versatile daily driver.

Who Should Skip This

Fitness fans, commuters, and anyone who wants one pair of earphones for everything should steer clear. The fitness score sits at a dismal 15.3 out of 100, comfort is poor for moving around, and there's no sweat or water resistance. If you rely on active noise cancellation, wireless freedom, or all-day wear, you'll be thoroughly disappointed. This is strictly an at-home critical listening tool.

Verdict

The ATH-LS400iS is a wired IEM for the sound extremist. Its 94th percentile audio performance is extraordinary, delivering detail and accuracy that trounce nearly everything in its path. But the poor build, middling comfort, and sky-high price make it a tough recommendation for anyone but the most dedicated sit-down listener. If you can find it around $598 and care only about music, grab it. If not, the latest flagship wireless buds from Sony or Sennheiser offer a far more livable package.

Usage Scores

Calls (18.6)Music (34.8)Overall (25.7)Budget (27.3)Gaming (27.4)Travel (20.2)Commute (18.9)Fitness (15.3)

Produtos semelhantes