Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 Review
The Samyang 14mm f/2.8 is optically sharp but held back by slow autofocus and no stabilization. It's a tool for a very specific job, not a versatile everyday lens.
The 30-Second Version
A sharp but one-dimensional ultra-wide for Canon DSLR die-hards. For everyone else, especially mirrorless shooters, there are better options that don't feel like a compromise.
Overview
The Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 is a weird one. It's an ultra-wide specialist that's optically sharp but feels a bit forgotten in the modern lens world. The one thing you need to know is this: it's a tool for a very specific job—capturing massive landscapes or the night sky on a Canon DSLR—and it's not trying to be anything else. If you're still rocking a full-frame Canon EF camera and need that extreme field of view, it's a solid, affordable option. But for everyone else, there are better paths.
Performance
The optical performance is the star here, landing in the 87th percentile. That means it's sharp, especially for the price. The surprise is how mediocre everything else is. The autofocus is in the 46th percentile, which our data confirms is just okay—it gets the job done but won't win any speed awards. There's no stabilization, which is a bummer for handheld video or low-light stills, and the build quality is just average. It does one thing well, and the rest is pretty forgettable.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Optical sharpness is excellent for the price. 92th
- Ultra-wide 14mm field of view is perfect for landscapes and astro. 76th
- Autofocus is a nice upgrade over the older manual-only versions. 75th
- More affordable than Canon's first-party ultra-wide primes.
Cons
- Autofocus is slow and hunty compared to modern lenses. 16th
- No image stabilization at all.
- Bulky and not versatile—it's a one-trick pony.
- We've seen reports of quality control issues with internal coatings.
The Word on the Street
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Wide-Angle |
| Focal Length Min | 14 |
| Focal Length Max | 14 |
| Elements | 15 |
| Groups | 10 |
| Coating | Ultra Multi-Coating (UMC) |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | Canon EF |
| Format | Full-Frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.1 lbs |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 200 |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.67 |
Value & Pricing
At $549, it's a decent value if you absolutely need a 14mm autofocus lens for your Canon DSLR and are on a budget. But 'value' is relative here. You're paying for the focal length and the optics, and accepting compromises everywhere else. For a specialized tool, it's priced right. For a general-purpose lens, it's not.
Price History
vs Competition
This lens exists in a niche. If you're looking for a versatile wide-angle for a Canon mirrorless camera, skip this and adapt the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM—it's cheaper, smaller, and designed for the new system. If you're stuck on DSLR and need width, the real competition is the manual-focus Samyang/Rokinon 14mm f/2.8, which is often hundreds cheaper and optically similar, just without AF. For most people, that's the smarter buy. Comparing it to the listed competitors like the Tamron 17-70mm is apples to oranges; that's a zoom for Sony APS-C, a completely different beast.
| Spec | Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 | Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF | Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X | Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony | Canon RF Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens | Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 14mm | 55mm | 35mm | 17-70mm | 24mm | - |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.4 | f/1.7 | f/2.8 | f/1.8 | f/1.4 |
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X | Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | false | false | false | false | true |
| Weight (g) | 485 | 281 | 400 | 544 | 272 | 320 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM | STM | Autofocus | Autofocus | STM |
| Lens Type | Wide-Angle | - | - | Wide-Angle Zoom | Wide-Angle | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 | 46.4 | 48.4 | 74.7 | 76 | 92.4 | 54.6 | 15.7 | 37.5 | 61.3 | 37.9 |
| Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare | 95.6 | 81.8 | 81.2 | 89.1 | 67.5 | 88.1 | 0 | 37.5 | 89.9 | 87.7 |
| Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare | 95.6 | 73.6 | 63.5 | 93.2 | 74 | 80.6 | 0 | 37.5 | 95.1 | 87.7 |
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD Compare | 46.4 | 59.2 | 64.4 | 77.4 | 90.8 | 54.6 | 75.2 | 92.5 | 95.1 | 87.7 |
| Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Compare | 46.4 | 81.8 | 87.7 | 81 | 82.5 | 75.8 | 0 | 37.5 | 98 | 99.9 |
| Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus Standard Prime Compare | 95.6 | 81.8 | 88.9 | 85.2 | 34.6 | 88.1 | 0 | 37.5 | 86.7 | 87.7 |
Common Questions
Q: Will the autofocus work if I adapt this to a Nikon Z camera?
Technically, maybe, but it'll be a clunky mess. Don't do it. Samyang makes a native Z-mount version—just buy that instead.
Q: Is the autofocus as fast as a Sony lens?
Not even close. Our data puts its AF performance in the bottom half. It's fine for static scenes, but forget about tracking anything that moves.
Q: Can I screw filters onto the lens hood?
Nope. You're looking at a pricey, bulky 150mm filter holder system if you want to use ND or polarizing filters. It's a major downside for landscape shooters.
Who Should Skip This
If you're looking for a versatile, do-it-all lens or you've moved to a mirrorless system, this isn't it. Go get a native mirrorless wide-angle zoom instead. If you need fast, reliable autofocus for anything beyond tripod work, look at first-party options, even used ones.
Verdict
We can only recommend this lens to a very specific photographer: someone with a full-frame Canon DSLR who shoots a lot of landscapes or astrophotography, wants autofocus, and is on a tight budget. For that person, it's a yes. For anyone with a mirrorless camera, anyone who values portability, or anyone who needs reliable, fast autofocus, this is an easy skip. The manual focus version often makes more sense.