Tamron Di II AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR LD Aspherical Macro Zoom Review

The Tamron 18-200mm does it all, but not very well. It's the lens you buy for convenience, not for great photos.

Focal Length 18-200mm
Max Aperture f/18
Mount Pentax K
Stabilization Yes
Weather Sealed No
Weight 397 g
Lens Type Zoom
Tamron Di II AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR LD Aspherical Macro Zoom lens
48.8 Overall Score

Overview

Look, if you need one lens to do everything on a trip and you don't want to think about it, this Tamron 18-200mm is your pick. It's the Swiss Army knife of lenses, covering everything from wide-angle shots to decent telephoto reach. But here's the one thing you need to know: you're trading away sharpness and low-light performance for that convenience. It's a compromise lens, and it knows it.

Performance

The stabilization is surprisingly good, landing in the 85th percentile, which helps a lot since the aperture is slow. But the optical performance is in the bottom third, so don't expect tack-sharp images corner to corner, especially at the extremes of the zoom range. It gets the job done, but it won't win any awards for clarity.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.4
Bokeh 8.7
Build 65
Macro 21.7
Optical 34.6
Aperture 8.8
Versatility 98.9
Social Proof 79.5
Stabilization 87.8

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Unbeatable zoom range for travel (18-200mm) 99th
  • Effective image stabilization 88th
  • Lightweight at just 397g 80th
  • Versatility score is off the charts (99th percentile) 65th

Cons

  • Optical quality is mediocre (35th percentile) 9th
  • Slow, variable aperture (f/3.5-6.3) 9th
  • Practically useless for close-up macro work 22th
  • Autofocus is just okay (45th percentile) 35th

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 18
Focal Length Max 200

Aperture

Max Aperture f/18
Constant Yes

Build

Mount Pentax K
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization Yes

Value & Pricing

At nearly $600, it's a tough sell. You're paying a premium for convenience, not quality. If your budget is tight, you'd get better image quality by buying two cheaper, sharper prime lenses.

$572

vs Competition

The Panasonic Lumix 14-140mm is a more direct competitor for Micro Four Thirds shooters, offering similar all-in-one convenience but likely better optics for its system. For Pentax DSLR users, the Canon EF-S 17-85mm is a more sensible choice if you can live with less reach, as its image quality is generally better. If you care about sharp photos, skip this superzoom and look at a prime like the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 for a fraction of the price.

Spec Tamron Di II AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR LD Aspherical Macro Zoom Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X Canon RF Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus Sirui Sniper Sirui Sniper 56mm f/1.2 Autofocus Lens (Sony E,
Focal Length 18-200mm 55mm 35mm 24mm - 56mm
Max Aperture f/18 f/1.4 f/1.7 f/1.8 f/1.4 f/1.2
Mount Pentax K Nikon Z Fujifilm X Canon RF Fujifilm X Sony E
Stabilization true true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false false false true false
Weight (g) 397 281 400 272 320 422
AF Type - STM STM Autofocus STM Autofocus
Lens Type Zoom - - Wide-Angle - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Tamron Di II AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR LD Aspherical Macro Zoom 46.48.76521.734.68.898.979.587.8
Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare 95.681.881.189.167.588.137.589.987.8
Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare 95.673.663.493.27480.537.595.187.8
Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Compare 46.481.887.68182.575.837.59899.9
Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus Standard Prime Compare 95.681.888.885.334.688.137.586.787.8
Sirui Sniper 56mm f/1.2 Autofocus Compare 46.496.773.853.479.895.937.59887.8

Verdict

Only buy this lens if you absolutely cannot carry more than one lens and you shoot mostly in good light. For everyone else, the optical compromises are too great for the price. Get a standard kit zoom and a cheap telephoto instead, and you'll have better photos.