JBL Junior Junior 320BT
JBL
56 Overall Score
vs
Apple BTH22
Apple
68 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Music
Studio
Work
Calls
Commute
Specifications
| JBL Junior Junior 320BT | Apple BTH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | — |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.12 kg★ | 0.15 kg |
| Ear Cushion | — | protein leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 30 mm | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 34 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 80 dB★ | — |
| Max SPL | 81 dB★ | — |
| Codecs | — | iClever BTH22 Kids Bluetooth Headphones, 60H Play Time, USB C Fast Charging, Bluetooth 5.4, AUX Cord,Safe Volume 74/85 dBA,Toddler Headphones for iPad/Tablet/Travel/School, Purple |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | — |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 50 hrs | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5 Minutes for 3 Hours | 10 mins = 5H |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | 500 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 1★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✗ | — |
| App | JBL Headphones | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
JBL Junior Junior 320BT
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong battery (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong connectivity (74th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Apple BTH22
- Strong comfort (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Pricing
JBL Junior Junior 320BT0.005score per dollar
vs
Apple BTH220.009score per dollar
Apple BTH22 offers 1.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Apple BTH22
Scores 68 overall, wins 4 of 7 usage categories and 4 of 30 specs.
