Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm
78 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Tamron
96 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Macro
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Portrait
Street
Specifications
| Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Telephoto Zoom | Wide-Angle Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 150 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 23 | 16 |
| Groups | 16 | 12 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X-Mount | Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M |
| Weight | 0.99 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 191 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.12x★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong versatility (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average macro (22th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong versatility (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR0.062score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD0.176score per dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD offers 2.8x better value for money
Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Verdict
Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 16 specs.
