LG 55EW5P-M 55" Full HD Transparent
このMonitorについて
LG 55EW5P-M 55" Full HD Transparent — screen size 55, resolution 3840 x 2160, panel type OLED, refresh rate 120, response time ms 0.10000000149011612.
- Screen size 55
- Resolution 3840 x 2160
- Panel type OLED
- Refresh rate 120
- Response time ms 0.10000000149011612
The 30-Second Version
The LG 55EW5P-M is a 55-inch transparent OLED sign that looks futuristic and moves smoothly at 120Hz, but its brightness is low and color accuracy is terrible. It costs as much as a car. Only worth it if you absolutely need to show graphics on top of real objects.
Overview
The LG 55EW5P-M is a 55-inch transparent OLED display built for commercial signage, not your living room. With 43% transparency, it layers digital content over real objects behind the screen, making it a head-turner in retail windows or museum exhibits. But this isn't a monitor you'd ever want on a desk. It's dim at 200 nits, color performance is bottom-of-the-barrel, and connectivity is sparse.
Performance
Despite some misleading 4K specs, this panel runs at a native 1920x1080. That's fine for signage but underwhelming up close. The 120Hz refresh and near-instant 0.1ms response are genuinely impressive—it sits in the top 5% of our database for raw speed. But the 200-nit brightness is weak, and color accuracy lands dead last in our rankings. For transparent overlays, that's often acceptable; for anything requiring good image quality, it's a hard pass.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stunning 43% transparency grabs attention 99th
- 120Hz and 0.1ms response deliver buttery motion 96th
- Clean metal bezel and installation-friendly design
- Unique overlay capability for retail and museum signage
Cons
- 200 nits is too dim for bright environments 1th
- Color accuracy is among the worst we've seen 12th
- Sparse connectivity—only HDMI and DisplayPort 13th
- Insane price, starting around $17,000 24th
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 55" |
| Resolution | 3840 (4K UHD) |
| Panel Type | OLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.1 |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 200 nits |
| Color Gamut | 1.07 Billion Colors (10-Bit) |
Connectivity
| Speakers | No |
Features
| Touchscreen | No |
| Weight | 2.6 kg / 5.7 lbs |
Value & Pricing
Pricing varies from $17,333 to $23,755 across vendors, with the best deal at the lower end. That's a serious commercial investment. If you're a high-end retailer creating a futuristic window display, the transparency effect might justify the cost. For any conventional use, it's terrible value. You could buy a fleet of superior standard monitors for the same money. Unless the see-through gimmick is mission-critical, skip it.
vs Competition
Stacked against gaming OLEDs like the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG or MSI MPG 491CQP, the LG loses in brightness, color, and connectivity. Those monitors hit 400-plus nits and cover wide color gamuts; the LG's 200-nit, bottom-tier color makes them look like HDR kings. The Alienware AW3423DWF and Samsung Odyssey also outclass it for general use. But none of them are transparent. That's the only reason you'd pick the LG—and it's a very niche reason.
| Spec | LG 55EW5P-M 55" Full HD Transparent | ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG | Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 LS57CG952NNXZA | MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED | Dell UltraSharp U4025QW | Alienware AW-Series 34 240Hz QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor 34.2-inch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 55 | 26.5 | 57 | 27 | 39.70000076293945 | 34 |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 7680x2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 5120 x 2160 | 3440 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | OLED | OLED | VA | OLED | IPS | OLED |
| Refresh Rate | 120 | 240 | 240 | 240 | 120 | 240 |
| Response Time Ms | 0.10000000149011612 | 0.029999999329447746 | 1 | 0.029999999329447746 | 5 | 0.029999999329447746 |
| Adaptive Sync | - | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible | Adaptive-Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Hdr | - | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 1000 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR 600 | VESA Certified DisplayHDR 400 Tr |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Color | Compact | Display | Feature | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG 55EW5P-M 55" Full HD Transparent | 0.9 | 31.9 | 98.7 | 23.7 | 12.8 | 95.5 | 11.9 |
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG Compare | 96.6 | 73.6 | 75.5 | 72.9 | 90.3 | 97.9 | 93 |
| Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 LS57CG952NNXZA Compare | 97.3 | 73.6 | 99.6 | 97.4 | 72.1 | 88.3 | 99.1 |
| MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED Compare | 96 | 63.4 | 97.3 | 86.7 | 90.3 | 97.9 | 82.6 |
| Dell UltraSharp U4025QW Compare | 97.6 | 86.6 | 98.2 | 97.4 | 72.1 | 57 | 99.1 |
| Alienware AW-Series 34 240Hz QD-OLED Curved Gaming Monitor 34.2-inch Compare | 98.4 | 79.6 | 85.4 | 92.1 | 90.3 | 97.9 | 95.3 |
Common Questions
Q: What is the actual resolution of this display?
Despite some spec sheets listing 3840x2160, the native resolution is Full HD 1920x1080. The panel uses a 43% transparent OLED with that resolution.
Q: Can I use this as a regular gaming monitor?
Technically yes, but you'll be disappointed. 200 nits is too dim for most rooms, color accuracy is poor, and the 1080p resolution on a 55-inch screen looks pixelated up close. A standard gaming OLED will vastly outperform it for half the price.
Q: How well does the transparency work in bright light?
The 43% transparency is visible, but the 200-nit brightness means overlaid graphics can wash out in direct sunlight. It works best in controlled indoor lighting.
Who Should Skip This
If you need a monitor for gaming, color grading, office work, or home entertainment, look elsewhere. The low brightness, awful color accuracy, and lack of modern ports make it a nightmare for daily use. And if budget matters at all, the $17,000-plus price tag is laughable for a 1080p screen.
Verdict
This is a purpose-built commercial display, and for that narrow use—overlaying digital content on physical objects—it excels. If you run a high-end retail space, a museum, or a flashy corporate lobby and have the budget, the effect is undeniably cool. Everyone else should walk away; this transparent OLED is not a monitor for mere mortals.