HP ZBook 14" Ultra G1a Multi-Touch
HP
84 综合评分
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 16" 2025
ASUS
74 综合评分
评分
Entertainment
Creator
Gaming
Developer
Student
Business
Compact
规格
| HP ZBook 14" Ultra G1a Multi-Touch | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 16" | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395★ | Intel Core Ultra 7 165H |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 16★ | 8 |
| Frequency | 3.0 GHz | 3.8 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB★ | 24 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | AMD Radeon | 5070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 8 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 128 GB★ | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 2 TB★ | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 16" |
| Resolution | 2880 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | OLED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 400 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 100% DCI-P3 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB Ports | — | 5★ |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1 Output | 1x HDMI |
| Wi-Fi | WiFi 7★ | WiFi 6E |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Yes★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.54 kg | 2.20 kg★ |
| Battery | 74 Wh★ | — |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
优缺点
HP ZBook 14" Ultra G1a Multi-Touch
- Strong ram (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong cpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong storage (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong screen (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (23th percentile)
- Below average reliability (31th percentile)
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 16" 2025
- Strong port (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ram (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong gpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average compact (13th percentile)13th %ile
价格
HP ZBook 14" Ultra G1a Multi-Touch0.024每美元得分
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 16" 20250.045每美元得分
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 16" 2025 性价比高 1.9 倍
结论
胜出: HP ZBook 14" Ultra G1a Multi-Touch
Scores 84 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 29 specs.
