Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Apple
95 综合评分
vs
Btootos Wireless

Btootos Wireless

Btootos
64 综合评分

评分

Budget
Apple
100
Btootos
65
Commute
Apple
96
Btootos
51
Travel
Apple
96
Btootos
51
Calls
Apple
94
Btootos
47
Fitness
Apple
91
Btootos
38
Gaming
Apple
81
Btootos
58
Music
Apple
75
Btootos
57

规格

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/ABtootos Wireless
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessin-ear
Ear TipsXXS, XS, S, M, Ll
Weight0.09 kg0.10 kg
Audio
Driver TypeDynamicdynamic
Driver Size14.199999809265137 mm
Drivers12
Impedance32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
SurroundSpatial AudioMicrophone Included, Noise Isolation, Surround Sound, Sweatproof, Touch Control
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive Audio
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.35.4
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs6 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Charging5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs36 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiriSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP57IP7

优缺点

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Btootos Wireless

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong sound (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

价格

Btootos Wireless is US$156 cheaper (7.5x less).

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A0.526每美元得分
vs
Btootos Wireless2.668每美元得分

Btootos Wireless 性价比高 5.1 倍

结论

胜出: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 33 specs.

Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

也值得考虑