Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55s Black 2026

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55s Black 2026

Lenovo
45 综合评分
vs
CLX SET TGMSETRTU5204BM Black 2025

CLX SET TGMSETRTU5204BM Black 2025

CLX
93 综合评分

评分

Gaming
Lenovo
7
CLX
88
Workstation
Lenovo
37
CLX
86
Home Office
Lenovo
47
CLX
86
Creator
Lenovo
15
CLX
83
Developer
Lenovo
45
CLX
82
Business
Lenovo
57
CLX
74
Ai Llm
Lenovo
15
CLX
71
Compact
Lenovo
47
CLX
27

规格

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55sCLX SET TGMSETRTU5204BM
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 250Intel Core i9 14900KF
CPU Multi-Core Score
25,592
58,345
Cores824
Frequency3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB36 MB
Graphics
GPUAMD Radeon 780MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score无数据
28,796
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB64 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 1512 GB2 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDNVMe SSD
Storage 25.9 TB
Storage 2 TypeHDD
Build
Form Factorsffmid-tower
PSU200W850W
Weight12.70 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports11
USB Ports29
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4Yes
EthernetRJ-45Gigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

优缺点

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55s Black 2026

  • Strong reliability (71th percentile)
  • Below average gpu (10th percentile)10th %ile

CLX SET TGMSETRTU5204BM Black 2025

  • Strong storage (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong ram (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile

价格

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55s Black 2026 is US$1,399 cheaper (2.9x less).

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55s Black 20260.061每美元得分
vs
CLX SET TGMSETRTU5204BM Black 20250.044每美元得分

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55s Black 2026 性价比高 1.4 倍

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55s Black 2026

结论

胜出: CLX SET TGMSETRTU5204BM

Scores 93 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 27 specs.

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 55s 更擅长:

Compact

CLX SET TGMSETRTU5204BM 更擅长:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

也值得考虑