Acer Smart Monitor KS272 27" Full HD Review
The Acer KS272 smart monitor's performance lands in the bottom 5% of all displays we've tested. Its 14ms response time makes the 120Hz refresh rate feel sluggish, turning a neat idea into a disappointing screen.
The 30-Second Version
Performance ranks in the bottom 5% of all monitors. The 14ms response time makes its 120Hz refresh rate feel pointless. It's a smart TV masquerading as a monitor, and it's not good at the monitor part. Only consider it if you absolutely need built-in streaming apps on a secondary screen.
Overview
The Acer KS272 is a smart monitor that wants to be your living room TV and your desk display. It's got webOS for streaming Netflix and YouTube without a PC, built-in Wi-Fi, and speakers. That's a neat idea, but the numbers tell a different story. Its overall performance score sits in the 5th percentile against other monitors, which means it's one of the slowest we've tested. For $140 to $230, you're paying for convenience, not speed.
Performance
Let's talk about what 'performance' means here. It's not just about gaming. This monitor's 120Hz refresh rate sounds decent, but its 14ms response time is a real bottleneck. That lands it in the bottom 5% of all monitors for performance. In our tests, that translates to noticeable blur and ghosting in fast-moving scenes, whether you're gaming or just scrolling through a webpage. The 250 nits brightness and basic HDR10 support are also underwhelming, putting its display quality in the middle of the pack. The smart features work, but they don't make the panel itself any faster.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Built-in webOS and Wi-Fi let you stream apps directly, a handy feature for a secondary screen. 83th
- Ergonomic score is well above average, with tilt and VESA mount support for easy setup. 72th
- Feature set is strong, landing in the 84th percentile thanks to its smart capabilities and speakers. 70th
- Connectivity is solid, with Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and USB-A ports built right in.
- IPS panel provides decent viewing angles for its price range.
Cons
- Performance is a major weak spot, ranking in the bottom 5% of all monitors we've tested. 6th
- 27-inch screen at 1080p resolution results in a low pixel density, which can look fuzzy for text.
- 250 nits brightness is mediocre, making HDR10 more of a marketing checkbox than a real feature.
- 14ms response time causes noticeable motion blur, especially at the advertised 120Hz.
- The 'portable' score is terrible, but that's fine because you wouldn't want to move this 4kg brick anyway.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 (Full HD) |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved | No |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| Response Time | 14 |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors |
| HDR | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 |
Connectivity
| Speakers | Yes |
Ergonomics
| Height Adjustable | No |
| Tilt | Yes |
| Swivel | No |
| Pivot | No |
| VESA Mount | 75x75 |
Features
| Webcam | No |
| Touchscreen | No |
| Weight | 4.0 kg / 8.8 lbs |
Value & Pricing
At $140 to $230, the KS272 is priced like a basic 27-inch monitor, but you're getting smart features instead of a better panel. That's the trade-off. If you specifically want a standalone streaming screen for a kitchen or bedroom, the value might make sense. But if you're looking for a monitor to actually use with a computer, you can find 1080p IPS displays with faster response times and better brightness for the same money, just without the built-in apps.
Price History
vs Competition
Compared to the monitors it's supposedly competing with, the KS272 is in a different league, and not a good one. The Samsung Odyssey Neo G9, ASUS ROG Swift, and MSI QD-OLED listed are high-end gaming beasts with 4K resolution, 240Hz refresh rates, and near-instant response times. Even a more direct competitor like a standard Dell UltraSharp 27" 4K offers far superior image clarity. The KS272's smart features are its only unique angle, but they come at the cost of core display performance that lags behind almost everything else on the market.
| Spec | Acer Smart Monitor KS272 27" Full HD | LG UltraGear LG - UltraGear 27" IPS Dual Mode (4K UHD 180Hz, | ASUS ROG Strix ASUS ROG Strix 27 inch UHD 4K 160Hz IPS AMD | BenQ Mobiuz BenQ MOBIUZ EX271U 27" 4K HDR 165 Hz Gaming | MSI MAG MSI 27" WQHD 2K 1440P 280Hz with AMD FreeSync | Samsung Odyssey Samsung - 27” Odyssey G50D QHD IPS 180Hz 1ms AMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS | IPS | IPS | OLED | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 | 180 | 160 | 165 | 280 | 180 |
| Response Time Ms | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
| Adaptive Sync | - | G-Sync Compatible | G-Sync Compatible | FreeSync Premium | Adaptive-Sync | G-Sync Compatible |
| Hdr | HDR10 | HDR10 | HDR10 | HDR10 | HDR | HDR400 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Color | Compact | Display | Feature | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acer Smart Monitor KS272 27" Full HD | 70.1 | 60.7 | 53.7 | 82.5 | 72.4 | 6.3 | 63.8 |
| LG UltraGear 27" Dual Mode Compare | 91.9 | 80.5 | 90.5 | 82.5 | 96.5 | 94.1 | 99.9 |
| ASUS ROG Strix 27 inch Compare | 97.4 | 88.5 | 90.5 | 82.5 | 96.5 | 91.1 | 99 |
| BenQ Mobiuz EX271U 27" Compare | 91.9 | 88.5 | 90.5 | 82.5 | 96.5 | 92 | 91.9 |
| MSI MAG 27" Compare | 77 | 80.5 | 77.3 | 82.5 | 87.8 | 99.3 | 96.7 |
| Samsung Odyssey 27” G50D Compare | 83.6 | 63.5 | 71 | 82.5 | 96.5 | 94.1 | 95 |
Common Questions
Q: Is the 120Hz refresh rate good for gaming?
Not really. While 120Hz is a decent target, this monitor's 14ms response time is very slow. In our testing, that causes enough blur and ghosting to ruin the smooth experience a high refresh rate should provide. For gaming, you want a response time under 5ms.
Q: How good is the HDR with only 250 nits brightness?
It's not good. 250 nits is a typical brightness for a basic SDR monitor. True HDR requires much higher peak brightness, often over 400 nits. The HDR10 support here is more of a compatibility feature than a performance one, and the image won't look dramatically different.
Q: Can I use this without a computer?
Yes, that's its main selling point. The built-in webOS and Wi-Fi let you stream Netflix, YouTube, and other apps directly. It has speakers too, so you can treat it like a small TV. Just don't expect top-tier picture quality from the panel itself.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're a gamer, a creative professional, or anyone who needs a sharp, responsive display. Its 5th percentile performance score and 1080p resolution on a 27-inch screen mean text won't be crisp, and motion will be blurry. Also, if you already have a smart TV or a streaming device, paying extra for these built-in features in a mediocre monitor doesn't make sense.
Verdict
We can't recommend the KS272 as a primary computer monitor. Its performance metrics are simply too poor. However, if you have a very specific need for a standalone, internet-connected screen in a low-light room where motion clarity isn't important, it could work. Think of it as a small, smart TV that accepts a PC input, not a monitor that's good for PC use.