Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Nextbase
19 Общая оценка
vs
FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
33 Общая оценка

Оценки

Beginner
Nextbase
17
FLATIC
37
Video
Nextbase
14
FLATIC
37
Product Photography
Nextbase
14
FLATIC
33
Youtube
Nextbase
12
FLATIC
31
Photography
Nextbase
15
FLATIC
31
Wedding Events
Nextbase
13
FLATIC
28
Sports Wildlife
Nextbase
15
FLATIC
26
Streaming
Nextbase
9
FLATIC
25
Travel
Nextbase
12
FLATIC
24
Vlogging
Nextbase
7
FLATIC
23

Характеристики

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera BackFLATIC
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/3-inch
Megapixels64 MP
Video
Max Resolution5K
Log Profile
Build
Weight0.78 kg

Плюсы и минусы

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

FLATIC

  • Strong video (77th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (75th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average display (26th percentile)
  • Below average burst (29th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (32th percentile)

Цены

FLATIC is 146 $ cheaper (3.7x less).

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back0.095баллов за доллар
vs
FLATIC0.613баллов за доллар

FLATIC предлагает в 6.5x лучшее соотношение цена-качество

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Вердикт

Победитель: FLATIC

Scores 33 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 6 specs.

FLATIC Лучше в:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Стоит также рассмотреть