ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 2025
ASUS
94 Pontuação geral
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" Black
Dell
94 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Gaming
Office
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Especificações
| ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" | Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 31.5" | 39.7" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 5120 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 2,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 120 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | Adaptive-Sync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 99%, Display P3 99%, sRGB 100%, BT.709 100% |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 600 |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | HDR600 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 3★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 4 x 2 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power | 42W | 40W★ |
| Weight | 8.80 kg★ | 12.70 kg |
Prós e Contras
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 2025
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" Black
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
Preços
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 20250.094pontos por dólar
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" Black0.080pontos por dólar
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 2025 oferece 1.2x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32"
Scores 94 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 30 specs.
