ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
ASUS
100 Pontuação geral
vs
HP E24mv E24mv G4 23.8"
HP
57 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Office
Gaming
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Especificações
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" | HP E24mv E24mv G4 23.8" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 23.8" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 5 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 250 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 16.7 Million Colors (6-Bit+FRC) |
| Color Depth | 10-Bit★ | 8 bit (6 bit + 2 FRC) |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | — | N/A |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 25W★ | 28W |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 3.90 kg★ |
Prós e Contras
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
HP E24mv E24mv G4 23.8"
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong connectivity (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong compact (77th percentile)
- Below average color (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (22th percentile)
- Below average performance (23th percentile)
Preços
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"0.182pontos por dólar
vs
HP E24mv E24mv G4 23.8"0.283pontos por dólar
HP E24mv E24mv G4 23.8" oferece 1.6x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 29 specs.
