MSI Thin Thin 15 Cosmos Gray
MSI
61 Pontuação geral
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Pro Space Black 2024
Apple
87 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Business
Entertainment
Compact
Student
Developer
Gaming
Creator
Especificações
| MSI Thin Thin 15 | Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core i5 13420H★ | Apple M4 Pro |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 8 | 14★ |
| Frequency | 2.1 GHz★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050★ | Apple (20-Core) |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Sem dados | |
| Type | discrete | — |
| VRAM | 6 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR6★ | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 4 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 15.6" | 14.2" |
| Resolution | — | 3024 px★ |
| Panel | IPS | Mini-LED★ |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz★ | 120 Hz |
| Brightness | — | 1600 nits★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1 | 3★ |
| USB Ports | 4★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 5 |
| HDMI | HDMI | 1x HDMI Output |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.86 kg | 1.60 kg★ |
| Battery | 52 Wh | 72 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 | macOS |
Prós e Contras
MSI Thin Thin 15 Cosmos Gray
- Strong storage (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong gpu (76th percentile)
- Strong port (75th percentile)
- Below average social proof (19th percentile)19th %ile
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Pro Space Black 2024
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong storage (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong reliability (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average cpu (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
Preços
MSI Thin Thin 15 Cosmos Gray0.061pontos por dólar
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Pro Space Black 20240.026pontos por dólar
MSI Thin Thin 15 Cosmos Gray oferece 2.3x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M4 Pro
Scores 87 overall, wins 5 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 28 specs.
