ViewSonic VX1754 17.3" Black 2025
ViewSonic
44 종합 점수
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 2021
ASUS
89 종합 점수
점수
Office
Portable
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Creative
사양
| ViewSonic VX1754 17.3" | ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 17.3" | 34" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3440 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 4 ms | 1 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync Premium★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 550 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 45% NTSC, 64% sRGB | 120% sRGB / DCI-P3 90% |
| Color Depth | 6-bit+FRC | 16.7 Million |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 2★ |
| USB-C | 2 | 4★ |
| Thunderbolt | No | — |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Power | 13W★ | 35W |
| Weight | 0.90 kg★ | 9.01 kg |
장단점
ViewSonic VX1754 17.3" Black 2025
- Strong compact (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Below average color (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average display (22th percentile)
- Below average feature (23th percentile)
- Below average ergonomic (29th percentile)
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 2021
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong color (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (28th percentile)
가격
ViewSonic VX1754 17.3" Black 20250.218달러당 점수
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 20210.304달러당 점수
ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34" Black 2021 1.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL1B 34"
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 30 specs.
