Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II
Fujifilm
31 종합 점수
vs
Canon RF VCM
Canon
88 종합 점수
점수
Portrait
Professional
Budget
Video Cinema
Landscape
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Street
Travel
사양
| Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II | Canon RF VCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | Wide-Angle |
| Focal Length Min | 58 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 58 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 14 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Coating | — | Canon ASC (Air Sphere Coating), SSC (Super Spectra Coating), Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.4 |
| Min Aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 14★ | 11 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | FUJIFILM X | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C | Full-Frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.38 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 7 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 280 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.56★ |
장단점
Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong aperture (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Below average social proof (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average macro (22th percentile)
- Below average optical (35th percentile)
Canon RF VCM
- Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong optical (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
가격
Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II0.026달러당 점수
vs
Canon RF VCM0.063달러당 점수
Canon RF VCM 2.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Canon RF VCM
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.
