HP EliteBook 16" 6 G1a
HP
66 종합 점수
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Space Black 2025
Apple
92 종합 점수
점수
Entertainment
Business
Student
Compact
Developer
Creator
Gaming
사양
| HP EliteBook 16" 6 G1a | Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 | Apple M5 ★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cores | 8 | 10★ |
| Frequency | 3.3 GHz★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | AMD Radeon 780M | Apple (10-Core) |
| Type | integrated★ | — |
| VRAM Type | Shared | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 16" | 14.2" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 3024 px★ |
| Panel | IPS | Mini-LED★ |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 62.5% sRGB | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| USB Ports | 2★ | 0 |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | 1x HDMI Output |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)★ | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.75 kg | 1.50 kg★ |
| Battery | 56 Wh | 72 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | macOS |
장단점
HP EliteBook 16" 6 G1a
- Strong port (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong storage (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average compact (27th percentile)
- Below average reliability (31th percentile)
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Space Black 2025
- Strong screen (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong reliability (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong port (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
가격
HP EliteBook 16" 6 G1a0.034달러당 점수
vs
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Space Black 20250.056달러당 점수
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Space Black 2025 1.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 27 specs.
