Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 Gray 2025
Acer
62 종합 점수
vs
Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen 2 Black 2024
Lenovo
66 종합 점수
점수
Business
Compact
Student
Developer
Entertainment
Creator
Gaming
사양
| Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 | Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | AMD Ryzen 7 7735U★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Intel Arc 140V★ | AMD Radeon 680M Graphics |
| GPU Benchmark Score | 데이터 없음 | |
| Type | integrated | integrated |
| VRAM | 16 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 16" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 1920 px |
| Panel | — | IPS★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 60 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 45% NTSC |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | 4★ | 2 |
| HDMI | — | Yes★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Gigabit Ethernet |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.40 kg★ | 1.81 kg |
| Battery | — | 47 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Pro |
장단점
Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 Gray 2025
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong compact (76th percentile)
- Strong storage (68th percentile)
- Strong cpu (66th percentile)
- Below average reliability (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average port (35th percentile)
Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen 2 Black 2024
- Strong social proof (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong reliability (78th percentile)
- Strong user sentiment (76th percentile)
- Strong port (69th percentile)
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average compact (25th percentile)
가격
Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 Gray 20250.096달러당 점수
vs
Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen 2 Black 20240.075달러당 점수
Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 Gray 2025 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Lenovo ThinkPad 16" E16 Gen 2
Scores 66 overall, wins 4 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 29 specs.
