Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Pro Space Black 2026
Apple
93 종합 점수
vs
HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a Pike Silver Aluminum 2025
HP
64 종합 점수
점수
Entertainment
Business
Student
Compact
Developer
Creator
Gaming
사양
| Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Pro | HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Apple M5 ★ | AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cores | 15★ | 6 |
| Frequency | — | 2.0 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Apple M5 Pro 16-core | AMD Radeon 840M Graphics |
| Type | — | integrated★ |
| VRAM Type | — | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 2 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14.2" | 14" |
| Resolution | 3024 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | OLED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | — | 60 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 1600 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | — | 62.5% sRGB |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 3★ | 2 |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 6 | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| Ethernet | — | Gigabit Ethernet |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.59 kg | 1.40 kg★ |
| Battery | — | 56 Wh★ |
| OS | Mac OS | Windows 11 Pro |
장단점
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Pro Space Black 2026
- Strong screen (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong reliability (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong storage (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a Pike Silver Aluminum 2025
- Strong port (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong compact (77th percentile)
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average reliability (32th percentile)
가격
Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Pro Space Black 20260.038달러당 점수
vs
HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a Pike Silver Aluminum 20250.051달러당 점수
HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a Pike Silver Aluminum 2025 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Apple MacBook Pro 14.2" M5 Pro
Scores 93 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 28 specs.
