Philips SHP9500
Philips
52 종합 점수
vs
TOZO HT3
TOZO
91 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Music
Work
Studio
Commute
Calls
사양
| Philips SHP9500 | TOZO HT3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg | 0.25 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | breathable ear cushion | Sponge |
| Headband | steel | Silicone Protein Sponge |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | neodymium | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 50 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 12 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 35 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB★ | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | TOZO HT3 Hybrid Noise Cancelling Headphones, 90H Battery Life Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth 6.0 Foldable Headset, AI Voice Assistant with 5 Mics, Connect 2 Devices and Hi-Res Sound, 32 EQ Audio Presets |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | 1.5 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 90 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 9 hours playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Other |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | TOZO |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
장단점
Philips SHP9500
- Strong social proof (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
TOZO HT3
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
가격
Philips SHP95000.609달러당 점수
vs
TOZO HT33.048달러당 점수
TOZO HT3 5.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: TOZO HT3
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.
