Fhumsh A10
Fhumsh
66 종합 점수
vs
Sony WI-C100
Sony
80 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Travel
Fitness
Commute
Music
Calls
Gaming
사양
| Fhumsh A10 | Sony WI-C100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | neckband |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | Small, Medium, Large |
| Weight | 0.20 kg | 0.04 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | 13 mm★ | 9 mm |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth 5.3, 50H Playback LED Display, HiFi Stereo ENC Headset, IPX7 Waterproof Earphones (2026-Black) | Sony WI-C100 Wireless In-Ear Headphones, Black |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Environmental Noise Cancellation | — |
| Transparency | — | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.0 |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth 5 |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 25 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hrs | 0.16699999570846558 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 1.5 hours to fully charge | 10 min for 1 hour playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 50 hrs★ | 25 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 1★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | Sony Headphones Connect |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX7 | IPX4 |
장단점
Fhumsh A10
- Strong battery (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong anc (79th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Sony WI-C100
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (73th percentile)
- Strong comfort (71th percentile)
가격
Fhumsh A107.358달러당 점수
vs
Sony WI-C1003.148달러당 점수
Fhumsh A10 2.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Sony WI-C100
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 6 of 34 specs.
