TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 종합 점수
vs
Apple S66

Apple S66

Apple
64 종합 점수

점수

Budget
TOZO
82
Apple
66
Gaming
TOZO
79
Apple
53
Travel
TOZO
77
Apple
59
Fitness
TOZO
73
Apple
32
Commute
TOZO
70
Apple
59
Calls
TOZO
69
Apple
64
Music
TOZO
69
Apple
44

사양

TOZO Crystal PodsApple S66
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm13.399999618530273 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACWireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones with 50H Playback, Deep Bass Stereo Ear Buds Clear Calls with LED Power Display, IPX7 Waterproof, in-Ear Earphones with Mic for Phone/Android/iPad, Jet Black
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybridhybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs50 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count42
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX7

장단점

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Apple S66

  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong anc (83th percentile)83th %ile
  • Strong battery (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong mic (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

가격

Apple S66 is US$11 cheaper (1.6x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods2.804달러당 점수
vs
Apple S663.391달러당 점수

Apple S66 1.2배 더 나은 가성비

TOZO Crystal Pods

Apple S66

결론

승자: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods 더 나은 점:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

이것도 고려해보세요