Apple EarPods
Apple
20 종합 점수
vs
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
EarFun
91 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Music
사양
| Apple EarPods | EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | s |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | hybrid |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | aptX Lossless, LDAC, LC3, LE Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 12 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 2 hours playback |
| Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 54 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | EarFun Audio App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | splash and weath | IP55 |
장단점
Apple EarPods
- Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
가격
Apple EarPods0.784달러당 점수
vs
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+1.708달러당 점수
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ 2.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 37 specs.
