Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2nd Gen
Bose
90 종합 점수
vs
JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSUAM
JBL
18 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Travel
Calls
Music
Gaming
Commute
Fitness
사양
| Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2nd Gen | JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSUAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Small, Medium, Large | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | aptX Adaptive | — |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Range | 9.100000381469727 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 3 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 20 Minutes for 2 Hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 18 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 2★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Bose app | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
장단점
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2nd Gen
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSUAM
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average battery (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average mic (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average social proof (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
가격
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2nd Gen0.359달러당 점수
vs
JBL Live Pro 2 JBLLIVEPRO2TWSUAM0.177달러당 점수
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2nd Gen 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2nd Gen
Scores 90 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 34 specs.
