Reolink Argus Argus PT
Reolink
33 종합 점수
vs
Ricoh GR GR IV HDF Black
Ricoh
40 종합 점수
점수
Product Photography
Streaming
Photography
Video
Youtube
Beginner
Vlogging
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Travel
사양
| Reolink Argus Argus PT | Ricoh GR GR IV HDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | CMOS |
| Size | — | aps-c |
| Megapixels | 5 MP | 25.739999771118164 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Type | — | Auto-area AF, Zone AF, Select AF, Pinpoint AF, Tracking AF, Cont |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Max Shutter | — | 1/4000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 1080p★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| Codec | — | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.75 kg | 0.23 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 250 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
장단점
Reolink Argus Argus PT
- Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (70th percentile)
- Below average sensor (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
Ricoh GR GR IV HDF Black
- Strong sensor (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong connectivity (67th percentile)
- Below average battery (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average evf (34th percentile)
가격
Reolink Argus Argus PT0.272달러당 점수
vs
Ricoh GR GR IV HDF Black0.025달러당 점수
Reolink Argus Argus PT 10.9배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Ricoh GR GR IV HDF
Scores 40 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 12 of 22 specs.
