FLATIC
FLATIC
33 종합 점수
vs
Denash Denash2fwmbdoqc6-12 White
Denash
32 종합 점수
점수
Video
Beginner
Product Photography
Youtube
Photography
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Streaming
Travel
Vlogging
사양
| FLATIC | Denash Denash2fwmbdoqc6-12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | Autofocus |
| Size | 1/3-inch | 75000000 |
| Megapixels | 64 MP | 75 MP★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 5K | 5K |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.78 kg★ | — |
장단점
FLATIC
- Strong video (77th percentile)
- Strong sensor (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
Denash Denash2fwmbdoqc6-12 White
- Strong sensor (79th percentile)
- Strong video (73th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
가격
FLATIC0.615달러당 점수
vs
Denash Denash2fwmbdoqc6-12 White0.440달러당 점수
FLATIC 1.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
무승부
Both products are closely matched — FLATIC wins 2 specs while Denash Denash2fwmbdoqc6-12 wins 2.
