Sigma fp fp

Sigma fp fp

Sigma
52 종합 점수
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink

Kodak
26 종합 점수

점수

Travel
Sigma
62
Kodak
20
Sports Wildlife
Sigma
61
Kodak
16
Wedding Events
Sigma
59
Kodak
18
Streaming
Sigma
58
Kodak
28
Beginner
Sigma
57
Kodak
27
Video
Sigma
56
Kodak
18
Product Photography
Sigma
54
Kodak
26
Photography
Sigma
52
Kodak
20
Youtube
Sigma
46
Kodak
19
Vlogging
Sigma
43
Kodak
15

사양

Sigma fp fpKodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK
Sensor
TypeBSI CMOS
Sizefull-frame
Megapixels24.600000381469727 MP
ISO Range100
Autofocus
AF Points49
AF TypeContrast Detection: 49
Eye AF
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)18 fps
Burst (Electronic)18 fps
Max Shutter1/8000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution4K
4K FPS30 fps
1080p FPS120 fps
10-bit
RAW Video
CodecCinemaDNG
Display & EVF
Screen Size3.2"
Touchscreen
Articulating
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.37 kg0.45 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBUSB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C
HDMIMicro-HDMI
Hot Shoe

장단점

Sigma fp fp

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong burst (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Strong video (72th percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (70th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (33th percentile)

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink

  • Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)
  • Below average display (26th percentile)

가격

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink is US$2,048 cheaper (21.5x less).

Sigma fp fp0.024달러당 점수
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink0.257달러당 점수

Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink 10.7배 더 나은 가성비

결론

승자: Sigma fp fp

Scores 52 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 17 of 27 specs.

Sigma fp fp 더 나은 점:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

이것도 고려해보세요