Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back
Nextbase
19 종합 점수
vs
FLATIC
FLATIC
33 종합 점수
점수
Beginner
Video
Product Photography
Youtube
Photography
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Streaming
Travel
Vlogging
사양
| Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back | FLATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | CMOS |
| Size | — | 1/3-inch |
| Megapixels | — | 64 MP★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 5K |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | — | 0.78 kg★ |
장단점
Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
- Below average sensor (26th percentile)
FLATIC
- Strong video (77th percentile)
- Strong sensor (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
가격
Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back0.095달러당 점수
vs
FLATIC0.613달러당 점수
FLATIC 6.5배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: FLATIC
Scores 33 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 6 specs.
