Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black
Kodak
14 종합 점수
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver 2020
Olympus
68 종합 점수
점수
Streaming
Beginner
Youtube
Vlogging
Video
Product Photography
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Travel
사양
| Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | MOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 16.350000381469727 MP | 20.299999237060547 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 100★ | 200 |
| Processor | — | TruePic VIII |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | — | Contrast Detection: 121 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 15 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 15 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | 1/2000 | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | 30 fps | 60 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✗ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | H.264/MOV | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✗ | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.34 kg | 0.34 kg★ |
| Battery Life | 280 shots | 360 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | Micro-USB (USB 2.0) | Micro-USB (USB 2.0) |
| HDMI | Micro HDMI | Micro HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
장단점
Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black
- Below average af (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average battery (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average sensor (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver 2020
- Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong display (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong burst (77th percentile)
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
가격
Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black0.070달러당 점수
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver 20200.114달러당 점수
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver 2020 1.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Scores 68 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 18 of 31 specs.
