Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Viltrox
73 総合スコア
vs
Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm

Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm

Sony
33 総合スコア

スコア

Street
Viltrox
77
Sony
29
Budget
Viltrox
70
Sony
29
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
66
Sony
27
Portrait
Viltrox
66
Sony
33
Macro
Viltrox
62
Sony
33
Professional
Viltrox
61
Sony
30
Video Cinema
Viltrox
59
Sony
34
Travel
Viltrox
58
Sony
16
Landscape
Viltrox
57
Sony
16

スペック

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mmSony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min56 mm33 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm33 mm
Elements11
Groups9
ED Elements4
CoatingHD nano-coating
Aperture
Max Aperture1622
Min Aperture1.71.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades916
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weight0.17 kg
Filter Thread52 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm488 mm
Max Magnification1:9.09

長所と短所

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm

  • Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average aperture (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

価格

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm is $856 cheaper (7.0x less).

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm0.510ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm0.033ドルあたりのスコア

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm 15.5倍のコストパフォーマンス

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm

結論

勝者: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm

Scores 73 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm 優れている点:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

こちらもおすすめ