Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm
78 総合スコア
vs
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Summilux Leica DG Vario-Summilux 25-50mm f/1.7 ASPH.
Panasonic
94 総合スコア
スコア
Professional
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Street
Travel
スペック
| Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Summilux Leica DG Vario-Summilux 25-50mm f/1.7 ASPH. | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Telephoto Zoom | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 25 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 150 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 23 | 16 |
| Groups | 16 | 11 |
| Coating | — | None |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.7 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X-Mount | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | — | Micro Four Thirds★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.99 kg | 0.64 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 280 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.12x | 1:4.7★ |
長所と短所
Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong versatility (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average macro (22th percentile)
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Summilux Leica DG Vario-Summilux 25-50mm f/1.7 ASPH.
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong aperture (81th percentile)81th %ile
価格
Fujifilm Fujinon XF XF50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR0.046ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Summilux Leica DG Vario-Summilux 25-50mm f/1.7 ASPH.0.058ドルあたりのスコア
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Summilux Leica DG Vario-Summilux 25-50mm f/1.7 ASPH. 1.3倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Summilux Leica DG Vario-Summilux 25-50mm f/1.7 ASPH.
Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.
