Sony Alpha ZV-E10 II Black
Sony
20 総合スコア
vs
Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Black 2025
Canon
100 総合スコア
スコア
Beginner
Sports Wildlife
Youtube
Travel
Video
Vlogging
Streaming
Wedding Events
Photography
Product Photography
スペック
| Sony Alpha ZV-E10 II | Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | aps-c | full-frame |
| Megapixels | — | 32.5 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | DIGIC X |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | データなし | |
| AF Type | — | Photo, VideoPhase Detection: 1053 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 40 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 40 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 6K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 180 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264, H.265, ProRes RAW |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 3.7M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.59 kg★ | 0.61 kg |
| Battery Life | — | 620 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI Output |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
長所と短所
Sony Alpha ZV-E10 II Black
- Strong sensor (77th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average social proof (27th percentile)
Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Black 2025
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
価格
Sony Alpha ZV-E10 II Black0.029ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Black 20250.037ドルあたりのスコア
Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Black 2025 1.3倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III
Scores 100 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 25 of 33 specs.
