Olympus E-PL7 16MP Mirrorless
Olympus
35 総合スコア
vs
Panasonic Lumix GH4 DMC-GH4 2015
Panasonic
62 総合スコア
スコア
Beginner
Youtube
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Streaming
Vlogging
Wedding Events
Video
Product Photography
Photography
スペック
| Olympus E-PL7 16MP Mirrorless | Panasonic Lumix GH4 DMC-GH4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | MOS | MOS |
| Size | micro-four-thirds | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 16.049999237060547 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Processor | — | 4-CPU Venus Engine |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 81★ | 49 |
| AF Type | — | -4 to +18 EV |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 40 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 24 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | AVCHD, MOV, MP4 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | ✓ | ✓ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.36 kg★ | 0.56 kg |
| Battery Life | — | 530 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB | — | USB-B (USB 2.0)★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro HDMI★ |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
長所と短所
Olympus E-PL7 16MP Mirrorless
- Strong display (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (76th percentile)
- Strong af (72th percentile)
- Below average sensor (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
Panasonic Lumix GH4 DMC-GH4 2015
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong burst (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong display (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average af (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average sensor (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
価格
Olympus E-PL7 16MP Mirrorless0.050ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Panasonic Lumix GH4 DMC-GH4 20150.080ドルあたりのスコア
Panasonic Lumix GH4 DMC-GH4 2015 1.6倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Panasonic Lumix GH4 DMC-GH4
Scores 62 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 14 of 26 specs.
