Sigma 258101 105 mm f/2.8 Macro
Sigma
70 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Tamron
96 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Macro
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Portrait
Street
Specifiche
| Sigma 258101 105 mm f/2.8 Macro | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Macro | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 105 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 105 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/16 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | FUJIFILM X |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.73 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 150 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1x | 1:4.7 |
Pro e Contro
Sigma 258101 105 mm f/2.8 Macro
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong aperture (69th percentile)
- Below average optical (35th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
- Strong versatility (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong social proof (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
Prezzi
Sigma 258101 105 mm f/2.8 Macro0.106punteggio per dollaro
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD0.138punteggio per dollaro
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.3x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 17 specs.
