HP ZBook 14" 8 G1i
HP
80 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
Razer
67 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Creator
Gaming
Entertainment
Compact
Developer
Student
Business
Specifiche
| HP ZBook 14" 8 G1i | Razer Blade Blade 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Intel Core Ultra 7 255H★ | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Dati non disponibili | |
| Cores | 16★ | 10 |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB★ | 16 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 500 Ada | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | discrete |
| VRAM | 4 GB | 8 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5★ | — |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 14" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 2560 px★ |
| Panel | IPS | OLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 300 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 62.5% sRGB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | 2★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1b | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7★ | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | — |
| Ethernet | No | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.70 kg | 1.63 kg★ |
| Battery | 77 Wh★ | 72 Wh |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
Pro e Contro
HP ZBook 14" 8 G1i
- Strong port (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong cpu (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Below average reliability (31th percentile)
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
- Strong gpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong screen (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong ram (73th percentile)
- Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average port (22th percentile)
Prezzi
HP ZBook 14" 8 G1i0.046punteggio per dollaro
vs
Razer Blade Blade 14 20250.023punteggio per dollaro
HP ZBook 14" 8 G1i offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.0x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: HP ZBook 14" 8 G1i
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 30 specs.
