Sennheiser ACCENTUM Open
Sennheiser
78 Punteggio complessivo
vs
SoundPEATS H3
SoundPEATS
86 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Travel
Music
Gaming
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Specifiche
| Sennheiser ACCENTUM Open | SoundPEATS H3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Weight | 0.00 kg★ | 0.20 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | hybrid |
| Driver Size | 11 mm | 12 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 3★ |
| Freq Min | 100 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 10 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 28 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 109 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC | LDAC, aptX Lossless |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 hrs | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 1 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10 Minutes for 1 Hour | 10 minutes for 2 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 37 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | — |
| Capacity | 36 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | No | PeatsAudio App |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX5 |
Pro e Contro
Sennheiser ACCENTUM Open
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong mic (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
SoundPEATS H3
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (92th percentile)92th %ile
Prezzi
Sennheiser ACCENTUM Open0.601punteggio per dollaro
vs
SoundPEATS H30.879punteggio per dollaro
SoundPEATS H3 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.5x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: SoundPEATS H3
Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 35 specs.
