TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Punteggio complessivo
vs
JVC HAFX38MA

JVC HAFX38MA

JVC
46 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Budget
TOZO
82
JVC
54
Gaming
TOZO
79
JVC
30
Travel
TOZO
77
JVC
27
Fitness
TOZO
73
JVC
41
Commute
TOZO
70
JVC
25
Calls
TOZO
69
JVC
24
Music
TOZO
69
JVC
26

Specifiche

TOZO Crystal PodsJVC HAFX38MA
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessRounded toe
Ear TipsMediums
Weight0.04 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5Water Resistant

Pro e Contro

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

JVC HAFX38MA

  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (79th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (71th percentile)
  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average mic (35th percentile)

Prezzi

JVC HAFX38MA is 15 USD cheaper (2.0x less).

JVC HAFX38MA

Verdetto

Vincitore: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Migliore per:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Da considerare anche