Philips TAT3519
Philips
54 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Calls
Travel
Music
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Specifiche
| Philips TAT3519 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Philips TAT3519 Wireless Earbuds,True Wireless Headphones with Noise Canceling Pro,Dynamic Bass,Clear Call,24 H Battery Life,Fast Charging,Bluetooth 5.3,IPX4,App/Touch Control,Black | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 15 minutes for 1 hour | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | PHILIPS Headphones app | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 |
Pro e Contro
Philips TAT3519
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Strong battery (74th percentile)
- Below average sound (28th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (31th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Prezzi
Philips TAT35190.897punteggio per dollaro
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.403punteggio per dollaro
Philips TAT3519 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.2x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 37 specs.
