Canon Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Review

The Canon RF 24mm F1.8 tries to be an affordable all-rounder, but mediocre optics and poor bokeh make it hard to recommend over adapted or third-party options.

Focal Length 24mm
Max Aperture f/1.8
Mount Canon RF
Stabilization Yes
Weather Sealed No
Weight 269 g
AF Type Autofocus
Lens Type Zoom
Canon Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens lens
98.7 ओवरऑल स्कोर

Overview

So you're looking at the Canon RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM lens. It's a wide-angle prime lens for Canon's mirrorless R system, and honestly, it's one of the more affordable ways to get into that lineup. With a 24mm focal length and a fast F1.8 aperture, it's pitched as a do-it-all lens for everything from landscapes to low-light shooting and even some close-up work. The big question a lot of people have is, 'Is this a good budget lens for a Canon mirrorless camera?' The short answer is, it's complicated. It tries to be a jack of all trades, but as you'll see, it's a master of none.

Performance

Let's talk numbers. The autofocus lands in the 48th percentile, which basically means it's average. It'll get the job done for still subjects, but don't expect lightning speed for fast-moving scenes. The optical performance is in the 32nd percentile, so while it's sharp enough in the center, the corners can get a bit soft, especially wide open at F1.8. The 'Macro' in the name is a bit misleading, as it scores in the 16th percentile for macro capability. You can get closer than a standard lens, but true macro photographers will be disappointed. The F1.8 aperture is a highlight on paper, but its bokeh quality is only in the 7th percentile, so backgrounds can look a bit busy and nervous instead of creamy and smooth.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.5
Bokeh 82.1
Build 88.7
Macro 80.7
Optical 83.4
Aperture 75.9
Versatility 37.4
Social Proof 86.4
Stabilization 99.9

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Affordable entry into the Canon RF lens system. 100th
  • Fast F1.8 aperture is good for low-light situations. 89th
  • Lightweight and compact design. 86th
  • Includes image stabilization (IS), which is rare for a lens at this price. 83th
  • STM motor provides quiet autofocus for video.

Cons

  • Optical performance is mediocre, with soft corners.
  • Bokeh quality is poor for an F1.8 lens.
  • 'Macro' capability is very limited.
  • Build quality feels cheap (35th percentile).
  • Not weather-sealed, so it's not great for rough conditions.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 24
Focal Length Max 24
Elements 11
Groups 9
Coating Canon SSC (Super Spectra Coating)

Aperture

Max Aperture f/1.8
Min Aperture f/22
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Canon RF
Format Full-Frame
Weather Sealed No
Weight 0.3 kg / 0.6 lbs
Filter Thread 52

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization Yes
Stabilization Stops 5.5

Focus

Min Focus Distance 140
Max Magnification 1:2

Value & Pricing

Priced between $535 and $599, this lens sits in an awkward spot. It's not cheap enough to be a no-brainer, and its performance doesn't really justify the price for a prime lens. You're paying for the RF mount and the Canon name. If you absolutely need a native RF wide-angle and are on a tight budget, it's an option. But for that money, you could find better-performing third-party lenses for other mounts, or save up for a sharper RF prime.

Price History

$500 $600 $700 $800 $900 Feb 28Feb 28Mar 16Mar 16Mar 18Mar 22 $799

vs Competition

This lens has a lot of competition, even if they're not all direct RF-mount rivals. The Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 for Z-mount, for example, is significantly cheaper and offers similar speed, though it's a different focal length. For Canon shooters, the real question is whether to go native or adapt an older EF lens. A used Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM, with an adapter, might cost less and offer better image stabilization and build quality. Compared to the Meike 55mm F1.8 Pro or the Fujifilm Viltrox 25mm F1.7, those lenses are often sharper and better built for similar money, but they're for different camera systems. The Sony 15mm f/1.4 G is in a different league optically and in price, but it shows what a premium wide-angle prime can do.

Spec Canon Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF Nikon Nikon S-Line Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Lens (Nikon Z) Tamron Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony Sirui Sirui Sniper 56mm f/1.2 Autofocus Lens (Sony E, Sigma Sigma Contemporary Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary Lens
Focal Length 24mm 55mm 24-70mm 17-70mm 56mm 16-300mm
Max Aperture f/1.8 f/1.4 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/1.2 f/3.5
Mount Canon RF Nikon Z Nikon Z Sony E Mount Sony E Sony E
Stabilization true true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false true false false false
Weight (g) 269 281 676 544 422 615
AF Type Autofocus STM Autofocus Autofocus Autofocus Autofocus
Lens Type Zoom - Zoom Zoom - Zoom
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Canon Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens 46.582.188.780.783.475.937.486.499.9
Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF 95.882.1838968.888.337.492.488.1
Nikon Nikon S-Line Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Lens (Nikon Z) 46.571.674.771.897.154.885.295.188.1
Tamron Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony 46.559.366.287.291.754.892.394.588.1
Sirui Sirui Sniper 56mm f/1.2 Autofocus Lens (Sony E, 46.596.575.951.380.895.937.498.488.1
Sigma Sigma Contemporary Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary Lens 46.555.860.878.796.541.499.995.688.1

Verdict

Should you buy the Canon RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM? Only in a very specific scenario. If you are a Canon R shooter who needs a lightweight, stabilized wide-angle for casual use and video, and you refuse to use an adapter, this lens gets you in the door. For everyone else, it's a hard sell. The optical weaknesses are too significant for the price. I'd recommend most people either save for a better RF prime like the 35mm f/1.8, look at adapted EF lenses, or consider if a zoom lens like the RF 24-105mm STM would be more versatile for the same budget.